Aleksandrov-Bakelman-Pucci estimates: Difference between revisions

From nonlocal pde
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nestor
No edit summary
imported>Nestor
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Let $u$ be a viscosity supersolution of the linear equation:
Let $u$ be a viscosity supersolution of the linear equation:


\[ a_{ij}(x) u_{ij}(x) \leq f(x) \;\; x \in B_1\]
\[ Lu \leq f(x) \;\; x \in B_1\]
\[ u \leq 0 \;\; x \in \partial B_1\]  
\[ u \leq 0 \;\; x \in \partial B_1\]  
\[ Lu:=a_{ij}(x) u_{ij}(x)\]


The coefficients $a_{ij}(x)$ are only assumed to be measurable functions such that for positive constants $\lambda<\Lambda$ we have
The coefficients $a_{ij}(x)$ are only assumed to be measurable functions such that for positive constants $\lambda<\Lambda$ we have
Line 16: Line 17:
\[ \sup \limits_{B_1}\; u^n \leq C_{n,\lambda,\Lambda} \int_{\{ u=\Gamma_u \} } f_+^n dx \]
\[ \sup \limits_{B_1}\; u^n \leq C_{n,\lambda,\Lambda} \int_{\{ u=\Gamma_u \} } f_+^n dx \]


Where $\Gamma_u$ is the "convex envelope" of $u$: it is the largest convex function in $B_2$ such that it lies below $u$ in $B_1$. The fact that the integration on the right hand side takes place only on the set where $u$ agrees with its convex envelope is an important feature of the estimate and it is not to be overlooked <ref name="CC"/>
Where $\Gamma_u$ is the "concave envelope" of $u$: it is the smallest non-nonnegative concave function in $B_2$ that lies above $u$ in $B_1$. The fact that the integration on the right hand side takes place only on the set where $u$ agrees with its concave envelope is an important feature of the estimate and it is not to be overlooked <ref name="CC"/>.


== ABP-type estimates for integro-differential equations ==
== ABP-type estimates for integro-differential equations ==
The setting for integro-differential equations is similar, what changes are the operators: let $u$ be a viscosity supersolution of the equation
\[ Lu \leq f(x) \;\; x \in B_1\]
\[ u \leq 0 \;\; x \in  B_1^c\]
\[ Lu:= \int_{\R^n} \delta u(x,y) K(x,y) dy\]
Here $\delta u(x,y):= u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x)$ and $K(x,y)$ is a measurable function of $x$ and $y$ such that for some $\sigma \in (0,2)$ and $\Lambda\geq\lambda>0$ we have
\[ (2-\sigma)\frac{\lambda}{|x-y|^{n+\sigma}} \leq  K(x,y) \leq (2-\sigma) \frac{\Lambda}{|x-y|^{n+\sigma}}\]
As in the second order ABP, the function $f$ is assumed to be continuous. Then, Caffarelli and Silvestre proved <ref name="CS"/> there is an estimate
\[ \sup \limits_{B_1} \; u^n \leq  C_{n,\lambda,\Lambda,\sigma}\sum \limits_{i=1}^m  ( \sup \limits_{Q_i^*} |f|^n) |Q^*_i|  \]
For some finite collection of non-overlapping cubes $\{Q_i \}_{i=1}^m$ that cover the set $\{ u=\Gamma_u\}$, each cube having non-zero intersection with this set.  Moreover, all the cubes have diameters $d_i \lesssim 2^{-\frac{1}{2-\sigma}}$. As before, $\Gamma_u$ denotes the "concave envelope" of $u$ in $B_2$.
Furthermore,  although the sharp constant may depend on $\sigma$, it is uniformly bounded for all $\sigma$ bounded away from zero. In particular, as $\sigma \to 2^-$ the above constant does not blow up, and since the diameter of the cubes goes to zero as $\sigma$ approaches $2$, one can check that this last estimate implies the second order ABP in the limit.


== References ==  
== References ==  

Revision as of 14:10, 4 June 2011

The celebrated "Alexandroff-Bakelman-Pucci Maximum Principle" (often abbreviated often as "ABP Estimate") is a pointwise estimate for weak solutions of elliptic equations. It is the backbone of the regularity theory of fully nonlinear second order elliptic equations [1] and more recently for Fully nonlinear integro-differential equations [2].

The classical Alexsandroff-Bakelman-Pucci Theorem

Let $u$ be a viscosity supersolution of the linear equation:

\[ Lu \leq f(x) \;\; x \in B_1\] \[ u \leq 0 \;\; x \in \partial B_1\] \[ Lu:=a_{ij}(x) u_{ij}(x)\]

The coefficients $a_{ij}(x)$ are only assumed to be measurable functions such that for positive constants $\lambda<\Lambda$ we have

\[ \lambda |\xi|^2 \leq a_{ij}(x) \xi_i\xi_j \leq \Lambda |\xi|^2 \;\;\forall \xi \in \mathbb{R}^n \]

Moreover, the function $f$ is assumed to be continuous. Then, the ABP Theorem says that

\[ \sup \limits_{B_1}\; u^n \leq C_{n,\lambda,\Lambda} \int_{\{ u=\Gamma_u \} } f_+^n dx \]

Where $\Gamma_u$ is the "concave envelope" of $u$: it is the smallest non-nonnegative concave function in $B_2$ that lies above $u$ in $B_1$. The fact that the integration on the right hand side takes place only on the set where $u$ agrees with its concave envelope is an important feature of the estimate and it is not to be overlooked [1].

ABP-type estimates for integro-differential equations

The setting for integro-differential equations is similar, what changes are the operators: let $u$ be a viscosity supersolution of the equation

\[ Lu \leq f(x) \;\; x \in B_1\] \[ u \leq 0 \;\; x \in B_1^c\] \[ Lu:= \int_{\R^n} \delta u(x,y) K(x,y) dy\]

Here $\delta u(x,y):= u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x)$ and $K(x,y)$ is a measurable function of $x$ and $y$ such that for some $\sigma \in (0,2)$ and $\Lambda\geq\lambda>0$ we have

\[ (2-\sigma)\frac{\lambda}{|x-y|^{n+\sigma}} \leq K(x,y) \leq (2-\sigma) \frac{\Lambda}{|x-y|^{n+\sigma}}\]

As in the second order ABP, the function $f$ is assumed to be continuous. Then, Caffarelli and Silvestre proved [2] there is an estimate

\[ \sup \limits_{B_1} \; u^n \leq C_{n,\lambda,\Lambda,\sigma}\sum \limits_{i=1}^m ( \sup \limits_{Q_i^*} |f|^n) |Q^*_i| \]

For some finite collection of non-overlapping cubes $\{Q_i \}_{i=1}^m$ that cover the set $\{ u=\Gamma_u\}$, each cube having non-zero intersection with this set. Moreover, all the cubes have diameters $d_i \lesssim 2^{-\frac{1}{2-\sigma}}$. As before, $\Gamma_u$ denotes the "concave envelope" of $u$ in $B_2$.

Furthermore, although the sharp constant may depend on $\sigma$, it is uniformly bounded for all $\sigma$ bounded away from zero. In particular, as $\sigma \to 2^-$ the above constant does not blow up, and since the diameter of the cubes goes to zero as $\sigma$ approaches $2$, one can check that this last estimate implies the second order ABP in the limit.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Caffarelli, Luis A.; Cabré, Xavier (1995), Fully nonlinear elliptic equations, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 43, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-0437-7 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Caffarelli, Luis; Silvestre, Luis (2009), "Regularity theory for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations", Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 62 (5): 597–638, doi:10.1002/cpa.20274, ISSN 0010-3640, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20274