Interior regularity results (local) and Fractional Laplacian: Difference between pages

From nonlocal pde
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Luis
No edit summary
 
imported>Luis
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Let <math>\Omega</math> be an open domain and <math> u </math> a solution of an elliptic equation in <math> \Omega </math>. The following theorems say that <math> u </math> satisfies some regularity estimates in the interior of <math> \Omega </math> (but not necessarily up the the boundary).
The fractional Laplacian $(-\Delta)^s$ is a classical operator which gives the standard Laplacian when $s=1$. One can think of $-(-\Delta)^s$ as the most basic  [[elliptic linear integro-differential operator]] of order $2s$ and can be defined in several equivalent ways (listed below). A range of powers of particular interest is $s \in (0,1)$, in which case for $u \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ we can write the operator as


\[-(-\Delta)^su(x) = c_{n,s} \int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\frac{\delta u (x,y) }{|y|^{d+2s}}dy\]


== Linear equations ==
where $c_{n,s}$ is a universal constant and $\delta u(x,y):= u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x)$. This particular expression shows that in this range of $s$ the operator enjoys the following monotonicity property: if $u$ has a global maximum at $x$, then $(-\Delta)^s u(x) \geq 0$, with equality only if $u$ is constant. From this monotonicity, a [[comparison principle]] can be derived for equations involving the fractional Laplacian.


Regularity results for linear equations are applicable to nonlinear equations as well through the linearization of the equation. However, this process requires some initial regularity knowledge on the solution (since the coefficients of the linearization depend on the solution itself). Therefore, the less regularity required for the coefficients, the more useful the theorem is.
== Definitions ==


All regularity results that require some modulus of continuity or smallness condition for the coefficients rely on the idea that the solution is locally close to a solution to an equation with constant coefficients. The proof is based on an estimate on how far these two solutions are at small scales. These type of arguments are often called [[perturbation methods]].
All the definitions below are equivalent.


From the results below for linear equations, [[De Giorgi-Nash-Moser]] and [[Krylov-Safonov]] are the only non perturbative results. Their assumptions are scale invariant in the sense that a rescaling of the solution ($u_r(x) = u(rx)$) would solve an elliptic equation with the same bounds as the original.
=== As a pseudo-differential operator ===
The fractional Laplacian is the pseudo-differential operator with symbol $|\xi|^{2s}$. In other words, the following formula holds
\[ \widehat{(-\Delta)^s f}(\xi) = |\xi|^{2s} \hat f(\xi).\]
for any function (or tempered distribution) for which the right hand side makes sense.


* [[De Giorgi-Nash-Moser]]
This formula is the simplest to understand and it is useful for problems in the whole space. On the other hand, it is hard to obtain local estimates from it.
<math> {\rm div \,} A(x) Du + b(x) \cdot \nabla u = 0 </math>


then <math>u</math> is Holder continuous if <math>A</math> is just uniformly elliptic and <math>b</math>
=== From functional calculus ===
is in <math>L^n</math> (or <math>BMO^{-1}</math> if <math>{\rm div \,} b=0</math>).


* [[Krylov-Safonov theorem]]
Since the operator $-\Delta$ is a self-adjoint positive definite operator in a dense subset $D$ of $L^2(\R^n)$, one can define $F(-\Delta)$ for any continuous function $F:\R^+ \to \R$. In particular, this serves as a more or less abstract definition of $(-\Delta)^s$.
<math>a_{ij}(x) u_{ij} + b \cdot \nabla u = f </math>


with <math>a_{ij}</math> unif elliptic, <math>b \in L^n</math> and <math>f \in L^n</math>, then the
This definition is not as useful for practical applications, since it does not provide any explicit formula.
solution is <math>C^\alpha</math>


* [[Calderon-zygmund estimate]]
=== As a singular integral ===
<math>a_{ij}(x) u_{ij} = f</math>
If $f$ is regular enough and $s \in (0,1)$, $(-\Delta)^s f(x)$ can be computed by the formula
\[ (-\Delta)^s f(x) = c_{n,s} \int_{\R^n} \frac{f(x) - f(y)} {|x-y|^{n+2s}} \mathrm d y .\]


with <math>a_{ij}</math> close enough to the identity (or continuous) and <math>f \in L^p</math>, then <math>u</math> is in <math>W^{2,p}</math>.
Where $c_{n,s}$ is a constant depending on dimension and $s$.


* [[Cordes-Nirenberg estimate]]
This formula is the most useful to study local properties of equations involving the fractional Laplacian and regularity for critical semilinear problems.
<math>a_{ij}(x) u_{ij} = f</math>


with <math>a_{ij}</math> close enough to the identity uniformly and $f \in L^\infty$,
=== As a generator of a [[Levy process]] ===
then $u$ is in $C^{1,\alpha}$
The operator can be defined as the generator of $\alpha$-stable Levy processes. More precisely, if $X_t$ is an $\alpha$-stable process starting at zero and $f$ is a smooth function, then
\[ (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2} f(x) = \lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac 1 {h} \mathbb E [f(x) - f(x+X_h)]. \]


* [[Cordes-Nirenberg estimate improved]] (corollary of work of Caffarelli for nonlinear equations)
This definition is important for applications to probability.
<math>a_{ij}(x) u_{ij} = f</math>


with $a_{ij}$ close enough to the identity in a scale invariant Morrey
== Inverse operator ==
norm in terms of $L^n$ and $f \in L^n$, then $u$ is in $C^{1,\alpha}$.
The inverse of the $s$ power of the Laplacian is the $-s$ power of the Laplacian $(-\Delta)^{-s}$. For $0<s<n/2$, there is an integral formula which says that $(-\Delta)^{-s}u$ is the convolution of the function $u$ with the ''Riesz potential'':
\[ (-\Delta)^{-s} u(x) = C_{n,s} \int_{\R^n} u(x-y) \frac{1}{|y|^{n-2s}} \mathrm d y,\]
which holds as long as $u$ is regular enough for the right hand side to make sense.


($a_{ij} \in VMO$ is a particular case of this)
== Heat kernel ==
The fractional heat kernel $p(t,x)$ is the fundamental solution to the [[fractional heat equation]]. It is the function which solves the equation
\begin{align*}
p(0,x) &= \delta_0 \\
p_t(t,x) + (-\Delta)^s p &= 0
\end{align*}


*[[Schauder estimate]]
The kernel is easy to compute in Fourier side as $\hat p(t,\xi) = e^{-t|\xi|^{2s}}$. There is no explicit formula in physical variables, but the following inequalities are known to hold for some constant $C$
<math>a_{ij}(x) u_{ij} = f</math>
\[ C^{-1} \left( t^{-\frac n {2s}} \wedge \frac{t}{|x|^{n+2s}} \right) \leq p(t,x) \leq C \left( t^{-\frac n {2s}} \wedge \frac{t}{|x|^{n+2s}} \right). \]


with $a_{ij}$ in $C^\alpha$ and $f \in C^\alpha$, then $u$ is in $C^{2,\alpha}$
Moreover, the function $p$ is $C^\infty$ in $x$ for $t>0$ and the following identity follows by scaling
\[ p(t,x) = t^{-\frac n {2s}} p \left( 1 , t^{-\frac 1 {2s}} x \right). \]


== Non linear equations ==
== Poisson kernel ==
Given a function $g : \R^n \setminus B_1 \to \R$, there exists a unique function $u$ which solves the Dirichlet problem
\begin{align*}
u(x) &= g(x) \qquad \text{if } x \notin B_1 \\
(-\Delta)^s u(x) &= 0 \qquad \text{if } x \in B_1.
\end{align*}


* [[De Giorgi-Nash-Moser]]
The solution can be computed explicitly using the Poisson kernel
For any smooth strictly convex Lagrangian $L$, minimizers of functionals
\[ u(x) = \int_{\R^n \setminus B_1} g(y) P(y,x) \mathrm d y,\]
where
\[ P(y,x) = C_{n,s} \left( \frac{1-|x|^2}{|y|^2-1}\right)^s \frac 1 {|x-y|^n}.\]


$ \int_D L(\nabla u) \ dx $
The justification of this Poisson kernel can be found in the classical book of Landkof (1.6.11')<ref name="L"/>.


are smooth (analytic if $L$ is analytic).
== Regularity issues ==
Any function $u$ which satisfies $(-\Delta)^s u=0$ in any open set $\Omega$, then $u \in C^\infty$ inside $\Omega$. This is a classical fact for pseudo-differential operators{{citation needed}}.


* [[Krylov-Safonov|Krylov-Safonov-Caffarelli]]
=== Full space regularization of the Riesz potential ===
If $(-\Delta)^s u = f$ in $\R^n$, then of course $u = (-\Delta)^{-s}f$. It is simple to see that the operator $(-\Delta)^{-s}$ regularizes the functions ''up to $2s$ derivatives''. In Fourier side, $\hat u(\xi) = |\xi|^{-2s} \hat f(\xi)$, thus $\hat u$ has a stronger decay than $\hat f$. More precisely, if $f \in C^\alpha$, then $u \in C^{2s+\alpha}$ as long as $2s+\alpha$ is not an integer (A proof of this using only the integral representation of $(-\Delta)^{-s}$ was given in the preliminaries section of <ref name="S"/>, but the result is presumably very classical). More generally, if $f$ belongs to the Besov space $B_{p,q}^r$, then $u \in B_{p,q}^{r+2s}$.


Any continuous function $u$ such that
=== Boundary regularity ===
From the Poisson formula, one can observe that if the boundary data $g$ of the Dirichlet problem in $B_1$ is bounded and smooth, then $u \in C^s(\overline B_1)$ and in general no better. The singularity of $u$ occurs only on $\partial B_1$, the solution $u$ would be $C^\infty$ in the interior of the unit ball (which is also a consequence of the explicit Poisson kernel).


$M^+(D^2 u) \geq 0 \geq M^-(D^2 u)$
== References ==
 
{{reflist|refs=
in the viscosity sense (where $M^+$ and $M^-$ are the Pucci operators), is Holder continuous.
<ref name="L">{{Citation | last1=Landkof | first1=N. S. | title=Foundations of modern potential theory | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | year=1972}}</ref>
 
<ref name="S">{{Citation | last1=Silvestre | first1=Luis | title=Regularity of the obstacle problem for a fractional power of the Laplace operator | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20153 | doi=10.1002/cpa.20153 | year=2007 | journal=[[Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics]] | issn=0010-3640 | volume=60 | issue=1 | pages=67–112}}</ref>
(Note that any solution to a fully nonlinear uniformly elliptic equation satisfies this, even with rough coefficients)
}}
 
* [[Ishii-Lions Lipschitz estimate]]
 
If $u$ solves a fully nonlinear equation
 
$F(D^2 u, Du, u, x) = 0$
 
which is degenerate elliptic but satisfies some structure conditions and some smoothness assumptions respect to $x$, then $u$ is Lipschitz.
 
(The proof of this is based on the uniqueness technique for viscosity solutions)
 
* [[Lin theorem]]
 
Any continuous function $u$ such that
 
$0 \geq M^-(D^2 u)$
 
in the viscosity sense, is twice differentiable almost everywhere and $D^2 u \in L^\varepsilon$.
 
(Note that any solution to a fully nonlinear uniformly elliptic equation satisfies this, even with rough coefficients)
 
* [[Krylov-Safonov|Krylov-Safonov-Caffarelli]]
If $u$ solves a fully nonlinear equation
 
$F(D^2 u, x) = 0$
 
which is uniformly elliptic and continuous respect to $x$ ($VMO$ is actually enough), then $u \in C^{1,\alpha}$.
 
* [[Evans-Krylov theorem]]
If $u$ solves a convex (or concave) fully nonlinear equation
 
$F(D^2 u, x) = 0$
 
which is uniformly elliptic and $C^\alpha$ respect to $x$, then $u \in C^{2,\alpha}$.

Revision as of 16:37, 12 March 2012

The fractional Laplacian $(-\Delta)^s$ is a classical operator which gives the standard Laplacian when $s=1$. One can think of $-(-\Delta)^s$ as the most basic elliptic linear integro-differential operator of order $2s$ and can be defined in several equivalent ways (listed below). A range of powers of particular interest is $s \in (0,1)$, in which case for $u \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ we can write the operator as

\[-(-\Delta)^su(x) = c_{n,s} \int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\frac{\delta u (x,y) }{|y|^{d+2s}}dy\]

where $c_{n,s}$ is a universal constant and $\delta u(x,y):= u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x)$. This particular expression shows that in this range of $s$ the operator enjoys the following monotonicity property: if $u$ has a global maximum at $x$, then $(-\Delta)^s u(x) \geq 0$, with equality only if $u$ is constant. From this monotonicity, a comparison principle can be derived for equations involving the fractional Laplacian.

Definitions

All the definitions below are equivalent.

As a pseudo-differential operator

The fractional Laplacian is the pseudo-differential operator with symbol $|\xi|^{2s}$. In other words, the following formula holds \[ \widehat{(-\Delta)^s f}(\xi) = |\xi|^{2s} \hat f(\xi).\] for any function (or tempered distribution) for which the right hand side makes sense.

This formula is the simplest to understand and it is useful for problems in the whole space. On the other hand, it is hard to obtain local estimates from it.

From functional calculus

Since the operator $-\Delta$ is a self-adjoint positive definite operator in a dense subset $D$ of $L^2(\R^n)$, one can define $F(-\Delta)$ for any continuous function $F:\R^+ \to \R$. In particular, this serves as a more or less abstract definition of $(-\Delta)^s$.

This definition is not as useful for practical applications, since it does not provide any explicit formula.

As a singular integral

If $f$ is regular enough and $s \in (0,1)$, $(-\Delta)^s f(x)$ can be computed by the formula \[ (-\Delta)^s f(x) = c_{n,s} \int_{\R^n} \frac{f(x) - f(y)} {|x-y|^{n+2s}} \mathrm d y .\]

Where $c_{n,s}$ is a constant depending on dimension and $s$.

This formula is the most useful to study local properties of equations involving the fractional Laplacian and regularity for critical semilinear problems.

As a generator of a Levy process

The operator can be defined as the generator of $\alpha$-stable Levy processes. More precisely, if $X_t$ is an $\alpha$-stable process starting at zero and $f$ is a smooth function, then \[ (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2} f(x) = \lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac 1 {h} \mathbb E [f(x) - f(x+X_h)]. \]

This definition is important for applications to probability.

Inverse operator

The inverse of the $s$ power of the Laplacian is the $-s$ power of the Laplacian $(-\Delta)^{-s}$. For $0<s<n/2$, there is an integral formula which says that $(-\Delta)^{-s}u$ is the convolution of the function $u$ with the Riesz potential: \[ (-\Delta)^{-s} u(x) = C_{n,s} \int_{\R^n} u(x-y) \frac{1}{|y|^{n-2s}} \mathrm d y,\] which holds as long as $u$ is regular enough for the right hand side to make sense.

Heat kernel

The fractional heat kernel $p(t,x)$ is the fundamental solution to the fractional heat equation. It is the function which solves the equation \begin{align*} p(0,x) &= \delta_0 \\ p_t(t,x) + (-\Delta)^s p &= 0 \end{align*}

The kernel is easy to compute in Fourier side as $\hat p(t,\xi) = e^{-t|\xi|^{2s}}$. There is no explicit formula in physical variables, but the following inequalities are known to hold for some constant $C$ \[ C^{-1} \left( t^{-\frac n {2s}} \wedge \frac{t}{|x|^{n+2s}} \right) \leq p(t,x) \leq C \left( t^{-\frac n {2s}} \wedge \frac{t}{|x|^{n+2s}} \right). \]

Moreover, the function $p$ is $C^\infty$ in $x$ for $t>0$ and the following identity follows by scaling \[ p(t,x) = t^{-\frac n {2s}} p \left( 1 , t^{-\frac 1 {2s}} x \right). \]

Poisson kernel

Given a function $g : \R^n \setminus B_1 \to \R$, there exists a unique function $u$ which solves the Dirichlet problem \begin{align*} u(x) &= g(x) \qquad \text{if } x \notin B_1 \\ (-\Delta)^s u(x) &= 0 \qquad \text{if } x \in B_1. \end{align*}

The solution can be computed explicitly using the Poisson kernel \[ u(x) = \int_{\R^n \setminus B_1} g(y) P(y,x) \mathrm d y,\] where \[ P(y,x) = C_{n,s} \left( \frac{1-|x|^2}{|y|^2-1}\right)^s \frac 1 {|x-y|^n}.\]

The justification of this Poisson kernel can be found in the classical book of Landkof (1.6.11')[1].

Regularity issues

Any function $u$ which satisfies $(-\Delta)^s u=0$ in any open set $\Omega$, then $u \in C^\infty$ inside $\Omega$. This is a classical fact for pseudo-differential operators[citation needed].

Full space regularization of the Riesz potential

If $(-\Delta)^s u = f$ in $\R^n$, then of course $u = (-\Delta)^{-s}f$. It is simple to see that the operator $(-\Delta)^{-s}$ regularizes the functions up to $2s$ derivatives. In Fourier side, $\hat u(\xi) = |\xi|^{-2s} \hat f(\xi)$, thus $\hat u$ has a stronger decay than $\hat f$. More precisely, if $f \in C^\alpha$, then $u \in C^{2s+\alpha}$ as long as $2s+\alpha$ is not an integer (A proof of this using only the integral representation of $(-\Delta)^{-s}$ was given in the preliminaries section of [2], but the result is presumably very classical). More generally, if $f$ belongs to the Besov space $B_{p,q}^r$, then $u \in B_{p,q}^{r+2s}$.

Boundary regularity

From the Poisson formula, one can observe that if the boundary data $g$ of the Dirichlet problem in $B_1$ is bounded and smooth, then $u \in C^s(\overline B_1)$ and in general no better. The singularity of $u$ occurs only on $\partial B_1$, the solution $u$ would be $C^\infty$ in the interior of the unit ball (which is also a consequence of the explicit Poisson kernel).

References