# Linear integro-differential operator

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 17:18, 26 January 2016 (view source)Luis (Talk | contribs) (→More singular/irregular kernels)← Older edit Latest revision as of 20:21, 17 November 2016 (view source)Luis (Talk | contribs) (→Symmetric kernels) (6 intermediate revisions not shown) Line 22: Line 22: In the purely integro-differentiable case, it reads as In the purely integro-differentiable case, it reads as - $Lu(x) = \frac 12 \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y)+u(x+y)-2u(x)) \, K(x,y) \mathrm d y.$ + $Lu(x) = \frac 12 \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x)) \, K(x,y) \mathrm d y.$ - The second order incremental quotient is sometimes abbreviated by $\delta u(x,y) := (u(x+y)+u(x+y)-2u(x))$. + The second order incremental quotient is sometimes abbreviated by $\delta u(x,y) := (u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x))$. == Translation invariant operators == == Translation invariant operators == Line 83: Line 83: The concept of uniform ellipticity can be relaxed in various ways. The following family of operators was considered in the paper of Silvestre and Schwab.. The integro-differential operators have the form The concept of uniform ellipticity can be relaxed in various ways. The following family of operators was considered in the paper of Silvestre and Schwab.. The integro-differential operators have the form \begin{align*} \begin{align*} - \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) \big) K(h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha < 1, \\ + \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) \big) K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha < 1, \\ - \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x)\chi_{B_1}(y) \big) K(h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha = 1, \\ + \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x)\chi_{B_1}(y) \big) K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha = 1, \\ - \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x) \big) K(h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha > 1. + \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x) \big) K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha > 1. \end{align*} \end{align*} - For $\lambda$, $\Lambda$, $\mu$ and $\alpha$ given, the kernel $K: \R^d \to \R$ is assumed to satisfy the following assumptions. + For $\lambda$, $\Lambda$, $\mu$ and $\alpha$ given, the kernel $K: \Omega \times \R^d \to \R$ is assumed to satisfy the following assumptions for all $x \in \Omega$, - * $K(h) \geq 0$ for all $h\in\R^d$. + * $K(x,h) \geq 0$ for all $h\in\R^d$. This is a basic assumption for the integral operator to be a legit diffusion operator. This is a basic assumption for the integral operator to be a legit diffusion operator. - * For every $r>0$, $\int_{B_{2r} \setminus B_r} K(h) \mathrm{d} h \leq (2-\alpha) \Lambda r^{-\alpha}$ + * For every $r>0$, $\int_{B_{2r} \setminus B_r} K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \leq (2-\alpha) \Lambda r^{-\alpha}$ - This assumption is more general than $K(y) \leq (2-\alpha) \Lambda |y|^{-n-\alpha}$. Indeed, it only requires the upper bound on average. + This assumption is more general than $K(x,h) \leq (2-\alpha) \Lambda |h|^{-n-\alpha}$. Indeed, it only requires the upper bound on average. * For every $r>0$, there exists a set $A_r$ such that * For every $r>0$, there exists a set $A_r$ such that Line 99: Line 99: ** $A_r$ is symmetric in the sense that $A_r = -A_r$. ** $A_r$ is symmetric in the sense that $A_r = -A_r$. ** $|A_r| \geq \mu |B_{2r} \setminus B_r|$. ** $|A_r| \geq \mu |B_{2r} \setminus B_r|$. - ** $K(h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha}$ in $A_r$. + ** $K(x,h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha}$ in $A_r$. - Equivalently $\left\vert \left\{y \in B_{2r} \setminus B_r: K(h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha} \text{ and } K(-h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha} \right\} \right\vert \geq \mu |B_{2r} \setminus B_r|. + Equivalently \[ \left\vert \left\{y \in B_{2r} \setminus B_r: K(x,h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha} \text{ and } K(x,-h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha} \right\} \right\vert \geq \mu |B_{2r} \setminus B_r|.$ \] - This assumption says that the lower bound $K(y) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda |y|^{-n-\alpha}$ takes place on sets of positive density in certain scale invariant sense. + This assumption says that the lower bound $K(x,h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda |h|^{-n-\alpha}$ takes place on sets of positive density in certain scale invariant sense. * For all $r>0$, $\left\vert \int_{B_{2r} \setminus B_r} h K(h) \mathrm{d} h \right\vert \leq \Lambda |1-\alpha| r^{1-\alpha}.$ * For all $r>0$, $\left\vert \int_{B_{2r} \setminus B_r} h K(h) \mathrm{d} h \right\vert \leq \Lambda |1-\alpha| r^{1-\alpha}.$ Line 112: Line 112: In some cases, it is interesting to study a family of kernels $K$ that are indexed by a matrix. For example, given the matrix $A$, one can consider the kernel of order $s$: In some cases, it is interesting to study a family of kernels $K$ that are indexed by a matrix. For example, given the matrix $A$, one can consider the kernel of order $s$: $K_A(y) = \frac{(2-s) \langle y , Ay \rangle}{|y|^{n+2+s}}.$ $K_A(y) = \frac{(2-s) \langle y , Ay \rangle}{|y|^{n+2+s}}.$ - This family of kernels has the outstanding property that the corresponding linear operator $L$ coincides with $Lu(x) = a_{ij} \partial_{ij}\left[(-\Delta)^{(s-2)/2} u \right] (x)$ for some coefficients $a_{ij}$. + This family of kernels has the outstanding property that the corresponding linear operator $L$ coincides with $Lu(x) = a_{ij} \partial_{ij}\left[(-\Delta)^{(s-2)/2} u \right] (x)$ for some coefficients $a_{ij}$. This property has been exploited in order to obtain an ABP estimate in integral form. == Second order elliptic operators as limits of purely integro-differential ones == == Second order elliptic operators as limits of purely integro-differential ones == Given any bounded, even, positive function $a: \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$, the family of operators Given any bounded, even, positive function $a: \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$, the family of operators - $L_\sigma u(x) = (2-\sigma) \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x))\frac{a(y)}{|y|^{n+\sigma}}dy,\;\; \sigma \in (0,2),$ $L_\sigma u(x) = (2-\sigma) \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x))\frac{a(y)}{|y|^{n+\sigma}}dy,\;\; \sigma \in (0,2),$ + define in the limit $\sigma \to 2^-$ a second order linear elliptic operator (possibly degenerate). This can be checked for any fixed $C^2$ function $u$ by a straightforward computation using the second order Taylor expansion. We get + $\lim_{\sigma \to 2^-} L_\sigma u(x) = a_{ij} \partial_{ij} u(x),$ + where $a_{ij}$ is determined by the quadratic form + $a_{ij} e_i e_j = \int_{\partial B_1} (x \cdot e)^2 a(x) \, \mathrm d S(x), \qquad \text{for vectors } e \in \R^d.$ - define in the limit $\sigma \to 2^-$ a second order linear elliptic operator (possibly degenerate). This can be checked for any fixed $C^2$ function $u$ by a straightforward computation using the second order Taylor expansion. A class of kernels that is big enough to recover all translation invariant elliptic operators of the form  $Lu(x) = Tr ( A \cdot D^2u(x) )$ is given by the kernels + A class of kernels that is big enough to recover all translation invariant elliptic operators of the form  $Lu(x) = Tr ( A \cdot D^2u(x) )$ is given by the kernels - + $K_A(y) = (2-\sigma) \frac{1}{|Ay|^{n+\sigma}},$ $K_A(y) = (2-\sigma) \frac{1}{|Ay|^{n+\sigma}},$ + where $A$ is an invertible symmetric matrix. - where $A$ is an invertible symmetric matrix. + Conversely, the condition + $\lambda |e|^2 \leq \int_{\partial B_1} (x \cdot e)^2 a(x) \, \mathrm d S(x) \leq \Lambda |e|^2, \qquad \text{for all vectors } e \in \R^d,$ + defines the largest class of stable operators that may be considered uniformly elliptic. Indeed, this is the condition that ensures regularity of solutions to translation invariant integro-differential equations. If we let the operator depend on $x$, it is an outstanding [[Open problems#Hölder estimates for singular integro-differential equations|open problem]] whether this condition alone (for every value of $x$) ensures [[Holder estimates]] for the integro-differential equation. == Characterization via global maximum principle == == Characterization via global maximum principle == Line 159: Line 164: {{Citation | last1=Courrège | first1=P. | title=Sur la forme intégro-différentielle des opéateurs de  $C_k^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$  dans $C(\mathbb{R}^n)$ satisfaisant au principe du maximum | journal=Sém. Théorie du potentiel (1965/66) Exposé | volume=2}} {{Citation | last1=Courrège | first1=P. | title=Sur la forme intégro-différentielle des opéateurs de  $C_k^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$  dans $C(\mathbb{R}^n)$ satisfaisant au principe du maximum | journal=Sém. Théorie du potentiel (1965/66) Exposé | volume=2}} {{Citation | last1=Schwab | first1= Russell W | last2=Silvestre | first2= Luis | title=Regularity for parabolic integro-differential equations with very irregular kernels | journal=arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3790}} {{Citation | last1=Schwab | first1= Russell W | last2=Silvestre | first2= Luis | title=Regularity for parabolic integro-differential equations with very irregular kernels | journal=arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3790}} + {{Citation | last1=Ros-Oton | first1= Xavier | last2=Serra | first2= Joaquim | title=Regularity theory for general stable operators | journal=arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3892}} + {{Citation | last1=Guillen | first1=N. | last2=Schwab | first2=R. | title=Aleksandrov-Bakelman-Pucci Type Estimates For Integro-Differential Equations | year=2010 | journal=Arxiv preprint arXiv:1101.0279}} }} }}

## Latest revision as of 20:21, 17 November 2016

The linear integro-differential operators that we consider in this wiki are the generators of Levy processes. According to the Levy-Kintchine formula, they have the general form

$Lu(x) = \mathrm{tr} \, A(x) \cdot D^2 u + b(x) \cdot \nabla u + c(x) u + d(x) + \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x) \chi_{B_1}(y)) \, \mathrm{d} \mu_x(y)$ where $A(x)$ is a nonnegative matrix for all $x$, and $\mu_x$ is a nonnegative measure for all $x$ satisfying $\int_{\R^n} \min(y^2 , 1) \mathrm{d} \mu_x(y) < +\infty.$

The above definition is very general. Many theorems, and in particular regularity theorems, require extra assumptions in the kernels $K$. These assumptions restrict the study to certain sub-classes of linear operators. The simplest of all is the fractional Laplacian. We list below several extra assumptions that are usually made.

## Absolutely continuous measure

In most cases, the nonnegative measure $\mu$ is assumed to be absolutely continuous: $\mathrm{d} \mu_x(y) = K(x,y) \mathrm{d}y$.

We keep this assumption in all the examples below.

## Purely integro-differential operator

In this case we neglect the local part of the operator $Lu(x) = \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x) \chi_{B_1}(y)) \, K(x,y) \mathrm d y.$

## Symmetric kernels

If the kernel is symmetric $K(x,y) = K(x,-y)$, then we can remove the gradient term from the integral and replace the difference by a second order quotient.

In the purely integro-differentiable case, it reads as $Lu(x) = \frac 12 \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x)) \, K(x,y) \mathrm d y.$

The second order incremental quotient is sometimes abbreviated by $\delta u(x,y) := (u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x))$.

## Translation invariant operators

In this case, all coefficients are independent of $x$. $Lu(x) = \mathrm{tr} \, A \cdot D^2 u + b \cdot \nabla u + c u + d + \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x) \chi_{B_1}(y)) \, K(y) \mathrm{d}y.$

## The fractional Laplacian

The fractional Laplacian is the simplest and most common purely integro-differential operator. It corresponds to a translation invariant operator for which $K(y)$ is radially symmetric and homogeneous.

$-(-\Delta)^{s/2} u(x) = C_{n,s} \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y)+u(x+y)-2u(x)) \frac{1}{|y|^{n+s}} \mathrm d y.$

## Stable operators

These are the operators whose kernel is homogeneous in $y$ $K(y)=\frac{a(y/|y|)}{|y|^{n+s}}\qquad\textrm{or}\qquad K(x,y)=\frac{a(x,y/|y|)}{|y|^{n+s}}.$ They are the generators of stable Lévy processes. The function $a$ cound be any $L^1$ function on $S^{n-1}$, or even any measure.

## Uniformly elliptic of order $s$

This corresponds to the assumption that the kernel is comparable to the one of the fractional Laplacian of the same order. $\frac {(2-s)\lambda}{|y|^{n+s}} \leq K(x,y) \leq \frac {(2-s)\Lambda}{|y|^{n+s}}.$

The normalizing factor $(2-s)$ is a normalizing factor which is only important when $s$ approaches two.

An operator of variable order can be either one for which $s$ depends on $x$, or one for which there are two values $s_1<s_2$, one for the left hand side and another for the right hand side.

## Smoothness class $k$ of order $s$

This class (sometimes denoted as $\mathcal L_k^s$) corresponds to kernels that are uniformly elliptic of order $s$ and, moreover, their derivatives are also bounded $|\partial_y^r K(x,y)| \leq \frac {\Lambda}{|y|^{n+s+r}} \ \ \text{for all } r\leq k.$

## Order strictly below one

If a non symmetric kernel $K$ satisfies the extra local integrability assumption $\int_{\R^n} \min(|y|,1) K(x,y) \mathrm d y < +\infty,$ then the extra gradient term is not necessary in order to define the operator.

$Lu(x) = \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y) - u(x)) \, K(x,y) \mathrm d y.$

The modification in the integro-differential part of the operator becomes an extra drift term.

A uniformly elliptic operator of order $s<1$ satisfies this condition.

## Order strictly above one

If a non symmetric kernel $K$ satisfies the extra integrability assumption on its tail. $\int_{\R^n} \min(|y|^2,|y|) K(x,y) \mathrm d y < +\infty,$ then the gradient term in the integral can be taken global instead of being cut off in the unit ball.

$Lu(x) = \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x)) \, K(x,y) \mathrm d y.$

The modification in the integro-differential part of the operator becomes an extra drift term.

A uniformly elliptic operator of order $s>1$ satisfies this condition.

## More singular/irregular kernels

The concept of uniform ellipticity can be relaxed in various ways. The following family of operators was considered in the paper of Silvestre and Schwab.[1]. The integro-differential operators have the form \begin{align*} \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) \big) K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha < 1, \\ \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x)\chi_{B_1}(y) \big) K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha = 1, \\ \int_{\R^d} \big(u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x) \big) K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \qquad \text{ if } \alpha > 1. \end{align*}

For $\lambda$, $\Lambda$, $\mu$ and $\alpha$ given, the kernel $K: \Omega \times \R^d \to \R$ is assumed to satisfy the following assumptions for all $x \in \Omega$,

• $K(x,h) \geq 0$ for all $h\in\R^d$.

This is a basic assumption for the integral operator to be a legit diffusion operator.

• For every $r>0$, $\int_{B_{2r} \setminus B_r} K(x,h) \mathrm{d} h \leq (2-\alpha) \Lambda r^{-\alpha}$

This assumption is more general than $K(x,h) \leq (2-\alpha) \Lambda |h|^{-n-\alpha}$. Indeed, it only requires the upper bound on average.

• For every $r>0$, there exists a set $A_r$ such that
• $A_r \subset B_{2r} \setminus B_r$.
• $A_r$ is symmetric in the sense that $A_r = -A_r$.
• $|A_r| \geq \mu |B_{2r} \setminus B_r|$.
• $K(x,h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha}$ in $A_r$.

Equivalently $\left\vert \left\{y \in B_{2r} \setminus B_r: K(x,h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha} \text{ and } K(x,-h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda r^{-d-\alpha} \right\} \right\vert \geq \mu |B_{2r} \setminus B_r|.$

This assumption says that the lower bound $K(x,h) \geq (2-\alpha) \lambda |h|^{-n-\alpha}$ takes place on sets of positive density in certain scale invariant sense.

• For all $r>0$, $\left\vert \int_{B_{2r} \setminus B_r} h K(h) \mathrm{d} h \right\vert \leq \Lambda |1-\alpha| r^{1-\alpha}.$

This last assumption is a technical restriction which measures the contribution of the non-symmetric part of $K$ and is only relevant for the limit $\alpha \to 1$.

## Indexed by a matrix

In some cases, it is interesting to study a family of kernels $K$ that are indexed by a matrix. For example, given the matrix $A$, one can consider the kernel of order $s$: $K_A(y) = \frac{(2-s) \langle y , Ay \rangle}{|y|^{n+2+s}}.$ This family of kernels has the outstanding property that the corresponding linear operator $L$ coincides with $Lu(x) = a_{ij} \partial_{ij}\left[(-\Delta)^{(s-2)/2} u \right] (x)$ for some coefficients $a_{ij}$. This property has been exploited in order to obtain an ABP estimate in integral form. [2]

## Second order elliptic operators as limits of purely integro-differential ones

Given any bounded, even, positive function $a: \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$, the family of operators $L_\sigma u(x) = (2-\sigma) \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (u(x+y)+u(x-y)-2u(x))\frac{a(y)}{|y|^{n+\sigma}}dy,\;\; \sigma \in (0,2),$ define in the limit $\sigma \to 2^-$ a second order linear elliptic operator (possibly degenerate). This can be checked for any fixed $C^2$ function $u$ by a straightforward computation using the second order Taylor expansion. We get $\lim_{\sigma \to 2^-} L_\sigma u(x) = a_{ij} \partial_{ij} u(x),$ where $a_{ij}$ is determined by the quadratic form $a_{ij} e_i e_j = \int_{\partial B_1} (x \cdot e)^2 a(x) \, \mathrm d S(x), \qquad \text{for vectors } e \in \R^d.$

A class of kernels that is big enough to recover all translation invariant elliptic operators of the form $Lu(x) = Tr ( A \cdot D^2u(x) )$ is given by the kernels $K_A(y) = (2-\sigma) \frac{1}{|Ay|^{n+\sigma}},$ where $A$ is an invertible symmetric matrix.

Conversely, the condition $\lambda |e|^2 \leq \int_{\partial B_1} (x \cdot e)^2 a(x) \, \mathrm d S(x) \leq \Lambda |e|^2, \qquad \text{for all vectors } e \in \R^d,$ defines the largest class of stable operators that may be considered uniformly elliptic. Indeed, this is the condition that ensures regularity of solutions to translation invariant integro-differential equations.[3] If we let the operator depend on $x$, it is an outstanding open problem whether this condition alone (for every value of $x$) ensures Holder estimates for the integro-differential equation.

## Characterization via global maximum principle

A bounded linear operator

$L: C^2_0(\mathbb{R}^n) \to C(\mathbb{R}^n)$

is said to satisfy the global maximum principle if given any $u \in C^2_0(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with a global maximum at some point $x_0$ we have

$(Lu)(x_0) \leq 0$

It turns out this property imposes strong restrictions on the operator $L$, and we have the following theorem due to Courrège [4] [5]: if $L$ satisfies the global maximum principle then it has the form

$Lu(x) = \mathrm{tr} \, A(x) \cdot D^2 u + b(x) \cdot \nabla u + c(x) u + \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y) - u(x) - y \cdot \nabla u(x) \chi_{B_1}(y)) \, \mathrm{d} \mu_x(y)$

where again $A(x)$ is a nonnegative matrix for all $x$, $c(x)\leq 0$ and $\mu_x$ is a nonnegative measure for all $x$ satisfying

$\int_{\R^n} \min(y^2 , 1) \mathrm{d} \mu_x(y) < +\infty.$

and $A(x),c(x)$ and $b(x)$ are bounded.

4. Courrège, P., "Sur la forme intégro-différentielle des opéateurs de $C_k^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$ dans $C(\mathbb{R}^n)$ satisfaisant au principe du maximum", Sém. Théorie du potentiel (1965/66) Exposé 2
5. Courrège, Philippe (1964), "Générateur infinitésimal d'un semi-groupe de convolution sur $R^n$, et formule de Lévy-Khinchine", Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques. 2e Série 88: 3–30, ISSN 0007-4497