imported>Luis |
imported>Mateusz |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Well posedness of the supercritical [[surface quasi-geostrophic equation]] ==
| | A function $f : [0, \infty) \to [0, \infty)$ is said to be an operator monotone function (complete Bernstein function, Nevanlinna-Pick function for the half-line) if $A \ge B \ge 0$ implies $f(A) \ge f(B) \ge 0$ for any self-adjoint matrices $A$, $B$. Many equivalent definitions can be given.<ref name="SSV"/> |
| Let $\theta_0 : \R^2 \to \R$ be a smooth function either with compact support or periodic. Let $s \in (0,1/2)$. Is there a global classical solution $\theta :\R^2 \to \R$ for the SQG equation?
| |
| \begin{align*}
| |
| \theta(x,0) &= \theta_0(x) \\
| |
| \theta_t + u \cdot \nabla \theta &= 0 \qquad \text{in } \R^2 \times (0,+\infty)
| |
| \end{align*}
| |
| where $u = R^\perp \theta$ and $R$ stands for the Riesz transform.
| |
| | |
| This is a very difficult open problem. It is believed that a solution would be a major step towards the understanding of Navier-Stokes equation. In the supercritical regime $s\in (0,1/2)$, the effect if the drift term is larger than the diffusion in small scales. Therefore, it seems unlikely that a proof of well posedness could be achieved with the methods currently known and listed in this wiki.
| |
| | |
| Note that if the relation between $u$ and $\theta$ was changed by $u = R\theta$, then the equation is ill posed. This suggests that the divergence free nature of $u$ must play an important role, unlike the critical and subcritical cases $s \geq 1/2$.
| |
| | |
| == Regularity of [[nonlocal minimal surfaces]] ==
| |
| | |
| A nonlocal minimal surface that is sufficiently flat is known to be smooth <ref name="CRS"/>. The possibility of singularities in the general case reduces to the analysis of a possible existence of nonlocal minimal cones. The problem can be stated as follows.
| |
|
| |
|
| For any $s \in (0,1)$, and any natural number $n$, is there any set $A \in \R^n$, other than a half space, such that
| | ==Representation== |
| # $A$ is a cone: $\lambda A = A$ for any $\lambda > 0$.
| | A function $f$ is operator monotone if and only if |
| # If $B$ is any set in $\R^n$ which coincides with $A$ outside of a compact set $C$, then the following inequality holds
| | \[ f(z) = a z + b + \int_{(0, \infty)} \frac{z}{z + r} \, \frac{\rho(\mathrm d r)}{r} \] |
| \[ \int_C \int_{C} \frac{|\chi_A(x) - \chi_A(y)|}{|x-y|^{n+s}} \mathrm d x \mathrm d y + 2 \int_C \int_{\R^n \setminus C} \frac{|\chi_A(x) - \chi_A(y)|}{|x-y|^{n+s}} \mathrm d x \mathrm d y \leq \int_C \int_{C} \frac{|\chi_B(x) - \chi_B(y)|}{|x-y|^{n+s}} \mathrm d x \mathrm d y + 2\int_C \int_{\R^n \setminus C} \frac{|\chi_B(x) - \chi_B(y)|}{|x-y|^{n+s}} \mathrm d x \mathrm d y. \] | | for some $a, b \ge 0$ and a Radon measure $\rho$ such that $\int_{(0, \infty)} \min(r^{-1}, r^{-2}) \rho(\mathrm d r) < \infty$. |
|
| |
|
| When $s$ is sufficiently close to one, such set does not exist if $n < 8$.
| | ==Relation to Bernstein functions== |
| | Operator monotone functions form a subclass of [[Bernstein function]]s. Namely, a Bernstein function $f$ is an operator monotone function if and only if the measure $\mu$ in the Bernstein representation of $f$: |
| | \[ f(z) = a z + b + \int_{(0, \infty)} (1 - e^{-t z}) \mu(\mathrm d t) \] |
| | has a [[completely monotone function|completely monotone]] density function. In this case |
| | \[ \mu(\mathrm d t) = \left( \int_{(0, \infty)} e^{-t r} \rho(\mathrm d r) \right) \mathrm d t \] |
| | This explains the name complete Bernstein functions. |
|
| |
|
| == An integral ABP estimate == | | ==Holomorphic extension== |
| | | Every operator monotone function $f$ extends to a holomorphic function on $\C \setminus (-\infty, 0]$ such that |
| The nonlocal version of the [[Alexadroff-Bakelman-Pucci estimate]] holds either for a right hand side in $L^\infty$ <ref name="CS"/> (in which the integral right hand side is approximated by a discrete sum) or under very restrictive assumptions on the kernels <ref name="GS"/>. Would the following result be true?
| |
| | |
| Assume $u_n \leq 0$ outside $B_1$ and for all $x \in B_1$,
| |
| \[ \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y)-u(x)) K(x,y) \mathrm d y \geq \chi_{A_n}(x). \]
| |
| Where $\chi_{A_n}$ stands for the characteristic function of the sets $A_n$. Assume that the kernels $K$ satisfy symmetry and a uniform ellipticity condition
| |
| \begin{align*} | | \begin{align*} |
| K(x,y) &= K(x,-y) \\
| | \Im f(z) & \ge 0 \qquad && \text{if } \Im z \ge 0 , \\ |
| \lambda |y|^{-n-s} \leq K(x,y) &\leq \Lambda |y|^{-n-s} \qquad \text{for some } 0<\lambda<\Lambda \text{ and } s \in (0,2). | | f(z) & \ge 0 \qquad && \text{if } \Im z = 0 , \\ |
| | \Im f(z) & \le 0 \qquad && \text{if } \Im z \le 0 . |
| \end{align*} | | \end{align*} |
| If $|A_n|\to 0$ as $n \to +\infty$, is it true that $\sup u_n^+ \to 0$ as well?
| | Conversely, any function $f$ with above properties is an operator monotone function. |
|
| |
|
| This type of estimate is currently known only under strong structural hypothesis on the kernels $K$.<ref name="GS"/>
| | Functions with nonnegative imaginary part in the upper half-plane are often called Nevanlinna-Pick functions, or Pick functions. |
|
| |
|
| == A [[comparison principle]] for $x$-dependent nonlocal equations which are '''not''' in the Levy-Ito form == | | ==Operator monotone functions of the Laplacian== |
| Consider two continuous functions $u$ and $v$ such that
| | Operator monotone functions of the Laplacian are particularly regular examples of translation invariant non-local operators in $\R^n$. More precisely, $A = f(-\Delta)$ for an operator monotone $f$ if and only if |
| | \[ -A u(x) = a \Delta u(x) + b u(x) + \int_{\R^n} (u(x + y) - u(x) - z \cdot \nabla u(x) \mathbf{1}_{|z| < 1}) k(z) \mathrm d z \] |
| | for some $a, b \ge 0$ and $k(z)$ of the form |
| \begin{align*} | | \begin{align*} |
| u(x) &\leq v(x) \qquad \text{for all $x$ outside some set } \Omega,\\
| | k(z) &= \int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty (4 \pi t)^{-n/2} e^{-|z|^2 / (4 t)} e^{-t r} \mathrm d t \rho(\mathrm d r) |
| F(x,\{I_\alpha u(x)\}) &\geq F(x,\{I_\alpha v(x)\})\qquad \text{for all $x \in \Omega$}.
| |
| \end{align*} | | \end{align*} |
| Is it true that $u \leq v$ in $\Omega$ as well?
| |
|
| |
|
| It is natural to expect this result to hold if $F$ is continuous respect to $x$ and the [[linear integro-differential operators]] $I_\alpha$ satisfy some nondegeneracy condition and continuity respect to $x$, e.g.
| | ==References== |
| \begin{align*}
| |
| I[u] = \int (u(x+z) - u(x) - Du(x)\cdot z 1_{B}(z))\mu_x(dz)
| |
| \end{align*}
| |
| where $(\mu_x)_x$ is a family of L\'evy measures, H\"older continous with respect to $x$?
| |
| | |
| Currently the comparison principle is only known if the kernels are continuous when written in the Levy-Ito form.<ref name="BI"/>
| |
| | |
| == A local [[differentiability estimates|$C^{1,\alpha}$ estimate]] for integro-differential equations with nonsmooth kernels ==
| |
| | |
| Assume that $u : \R^n \to \R$ is a bounded function satisfying a [[fully nonlinear integro-differential equation]] $Iu=0$ in $B_1$. Assume that $I$ is elliptic with respect to the family of kernels $K$ such that
| |
| \[ \frac{\lambda(2-s)}{|y|^{n+s}} \leq K(y) \leq \frac{\Lambda(2-s)}{|y|^{n+s}}. \]
| |
| Is it true that $u \in C^{1,\alpha}(B_1)$?
| |
| | |
| An extra symmetry assumptions on the kernels may or maynot be necessary. The difficulty here is the lack of any smoothness assumption on the tails of the kernels $K$. This assumption is used in a localization argument in the proof of the [[differentiability estimates|$C^{1,\alpha}$ estimates]] <ref name="CS"/>. It is conceivable that the assumption may not be necessary at least for $s>1$.
| |
| | |
| The need of the smoothness assumption for the $C^{1,\alpha}$ estimate is a subtle technical requirement. It is easy to overlook going through the proof naively.
| |
| | |
| Note that the assumption is used only to localize an iteration of the [[Holder estimates]]. An equation of the form $Iu = f$ in the whole space $\R^n$ with $f$ smooth enough would easily have $C^{1,\alpha}$ estimates without any smoothness restriction of the tails of the kernel.
| |
| | |
| It is not clear how important or difficult this problem is. The solution may end up being a relatively simple technical approximation technique or may require a fundamentally new idea.
| |
| | |
| The same difficulty arises for $C^{s+\alpha}$ [[nonlocal Evans-Krylov theorem|estimates for convex equations]]. For example, is it true that a bounded function $u$ such that $M^+u = 0$ in $B_1$, where $M^+$ is the [[extremal operators|monster Pucci operator]] is $C^{s+\alpha}$ for some $\alpha>0$?
| |
| | |
| == Optimal regularity for the [[obstacle problem]] for a general integro-differential operator ==
| |
| | |
| Let $u$ be the solution to the [[obstacle problem for the fractional laplacian]],
| |
| \begin{align*}
| |
| u &\geq \varphi \qquad \text{in } \R^n, \\
| |
| (-\Delta)^{s/2} u &\geq 0 \qquad \text{in } \R^n, \\
| |
| (-\Delta)^{s/2} u &= 0 \qquad \text{in } \{u>\varphi\}, \\
| |
| \end{align*}
| |
| where $\varphi$ is a smooth compactly supported function. It is known that $u \in C^{1,s/2}$ (where $s$ coincides with the order of the fractional Laplacian). This regularity is optimal in the sense that one can construct solutions that are not in $C^{1,s/2+\varepsilon}$ for any $\varepsilon>0$. One can consider the same problem replacing the fractional Laplacian by any other nonlocal operator. In fact, this problem corresponds to the [[optimal stopping problem]] in stochastic control, with applications to mathematical finance. The fractional Laplacian is just the particular case when the [[Levy process]] involved is $\alpha$-stable. The optimal regularity for the general problem is currently an open problem. Even in the linear case with constant coefficients this is nontrivial. If $u$ is a solution of
| |
| \begin{align*}
| |
| u &\geq \varphi \qquad \text{in } \R^n, \\
| |
| L u &\leq 0 \qquad \text{in } \R^n, \\
| |
| L u &= 0 \qquad \text{in } \{u>\varphi\}, \\
| |
| \end{align*}
| |
| where $L$ is a [[linear integro-differential operator]], then what is the optimal regularity we can obtain for $u$?
| |
| | |
| The optimal regularity would naturally depend on some assumptions on the linear operator $L$. If $L$ is a purely integro-differential with a kernel $K$ satisfying the usual ellipticity conditions
| |
| \begin{align*}
| |
| K(y) &= K(-y) \\
| |
| \frac{\lambda(2-s)}{ |y|^{n+s}} \leq K(y) &\leq \frac{\Lambda(2-s)}{ |y|^{n+s}} \qquad \text{for some } 0<\lambda<\Lambda \text{ and } s \in (0,2),
| |
| \end{align*}
| |
| it is natural to expect the solution $u$ to be $C^s$, but this regularity is not optimal. Is the optimal regularity going to be $C^{1,s/2}$ as in the fractional Laplacian case? Most probably some extra assumption on the kernel will be needed.
| |
| | |
| A solution to this problem would be very interesting if it provides an optimal regularity result for a natural family of kernels. If the assumption is something hard to check (like for example that there exists an extension problem whose Dirichlet to Neumann map is $L$), then the result may not be that interesting.
| |
| | |
| == Holder estimates for drift-diffusion equations (sharp assumptions for $b$ in the case $s>1/2$) ==
| |
| | |
| Consider a [[drift-diffusion equation]] of the form
| |
| \[ u_t + b \cdot \nabla u + (-\Delta)^s u = 0.\]
| |
| | |
| The solution $u$ is known to become Holder continuous under a variety of assumptions on the vector field $b$. If we assume that $\mathrm{div}\, b = 0$, we may expect that the required assumptions are slightly more flexible. Indeed, if $s=1/2$, the solution $u$ becomes Holder for positive time if $b \in L^\infty(BMO)$ <ref name="CV"/>. On the other hand, if $s=1$, the solution $u$ becomes Holder continuous for positive time if $b \in L^\infty(BMO^{-1})$ (if $b$ is the sum of derivatives of $BMO$ functions) <ref name="FV"/> <ref name="SSSZ"/>. A natural conjecture would be that the same result applies for $s \in (1/2,1)$ if $b \in L^\infty(BMO^{2s-1})$ (meaning that $(-\Delta)^{1-2s} b \in L^\infty(BMO)$).
| |
| | |
| The case $s < 1/2$ is completely understood and the assumption $\mathrm{div}\, b =0$ is not even necessary. For $s \in (1/2,1)$, only some perturbative results seem to be known under stronger assumptions. It is conceivable that the approach of Caffarelli and Vasseur <ref name="CV"/> can be worked out assuming that $b \in L^\infty(L^p)$ for a critical power $p$.
| |
| | |
| == Complete classification of free boundary points in the [[fractional obstacle problem]] ==
| |
| | |
| Some free boundary points of the [[fractional obstacle problem]] are classified as regular and the free boundary is known to be smooth around them <ref name="CSS"/>. Other points on the free boundary are classified as singular, and they are shown to be contained in a lower dimensional differentiable surface, and therefore to be rare <ref name="GP"/>. However, there may be other points on the free boundary that do not fall under those two categories. Two questions need to be answered.\
| |
| # Can there be any point on the free boundary that is neither regular nor singular? It is easy to produce examples in the [[thin obstacle problem]], using the [[extension technique]]. However, it is not clear if such examples can be made in the original formulation of the [[fractional obstacle problem]] because of the decay at infinity requirement.
| |
| # In case that a point of a third category exist, is the free boundary smooth around these points in the ''third category''?
| |
| | |
| Other open problems concerning the [[fractional obstacle problem]] are
| |
| # Further regularity of the free boundary in smoother classes than $C^{1,\alpha}$.
| |
| # Regularity of the free boundary for the parabolic problem.
| |
| | |
| == References == | |
| {{reflist|refs= | | {{reflist|refs= |
| <ref name="CS">{{Citation | last1=Caffarelli | first1=Luis | last2=Silvestre | first2=Luis | title=Regularity theory for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20274 | doi=10.1002/cpa.20274 | year=2009 | journal=[[Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics]] | issn=0010-3640 | volume=62 | issue=5 | pages=597–638}}</ref> | | <ref name="SSV">{{Citation | last1=Schilling | first1=R. | last2=Song | first2=R. | last3=Vondraček | first3=Z. | title=Bernstein functions. Theory and Applications | year=2010 | publisher=de Gruyter, Berlin | series=Studies in Mathematics | volume=37 | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110215311 | doi=10.1515/9783110215311}}</ref> |
| <ref name="CV">{{Citation | last1=Caffarelli | first1=Luis A. | last2=Vasseur | first2=Alexis | title=Drift diffusion equations with fractional diffusion and the quasi-geostrophic equation | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010.171.1903 | doi=10.4007/annals.2010.171.1903 | year=2010 | journal=[[Annals of Mathematics|Annals of Mathematics. Second Series]] | issn=0003-486X | volume=171 | issue=3 | pages=1903–1930}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="SSSZ">{{Citation | last1=Seregin | first1=G. | last2=Silvestre | first2=Luis | last3=Sverak | first3=V. | last4=Zlatos | first4=A. | title=On divergence-free drifts | year=2010 | journal=Arxiv preprint arXiv:1010.6025}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="FV">{{Citation | last1=Friedlander | first1=S. | last2=Vicol | first2=V. | title=Global well-posedness for an advection-diffusion equation arising in magneto-geostrophic dynamics | year=2011 | journal=Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="CRS">{{Citation | last1=Caffarelli | first1=Luis A. | last2=Roquejoffre | first2=Jean Michel |last3= Savin | first3= Ovidiu | title= Nonlocal Minimal Surfaces | url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpa.20331/abstract | doi=10.1002/cpa.20331 | year=2010 | journal=[[Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics]] | issn=0003-486X | volume=63 | issue=9 | pages=1111–1144}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="GS">{{Citation | last1=Guillen | first1=N. | last2=Schwab | first2=R. | title=Aleksandrov-Bakelman-Pucci Type Estimates For Integro-Differential Equations | year=2010 | journal=Arxiv preprint arXiv:1101.0279}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="CSS">{{Citation | last1=Caffarelli | first1=Luis A. | last2=Salsa | first2=Sandro | last3=Silvestre | first3=Luis | title=Regularity estimates for the solution and the free boundary of the obstacle problem for the fractional Laplacian | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-007-0086-6 | doi=10.1007/s00222-007-0086-6 | year=2008 | journal=[[Inventiones Mathematicae]] | issn=0020-9910 | volume=171 | issue=2 | pages=425–461}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="GP">{{Citation | last1=Petrosyan | first1=A. | last2=Garofalo | first2=N. | title=Some new monotonicity formulas and the singular set in the lower dimensional obstacle problem | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | year=2009 | journal=[[Inventiones Mathematicae]] | issn=0020-9910 | volume=177 | issue=2 | pages=415–461}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="GS">{{Citation | last1=Guillen | first1=N. | last2=Schwab | first2=R. | title=Aleksandrov-bakelman-pucci type estimates for integro-differential equations | year=2010 | journal=Arxiv preprint arXiv:1101.0279}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name="BI">{{Citation | last1=Barles | first1=Guy | last2=Imbert | first2=Cyril | title=Second-order elliptic integro-differential equations: viscosity solutions' theory revisited | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2007.02.007 | doi=10.1016/j.anihpc.2007.02.007 | year=2008 | journal=Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré. Analyse Non Linéaire | issn=0294-1449 | volume=25 | issue=3 | pages=567–585}}</ref>
| |
| }} | | }} |
| | |
| | {{stub}} |