Nonlocal minimal surfaces and Boltzmann equation: Difference between pages

From nonlocal pde
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nestor
 
imported>Luis
 
Line 1: Line 1:
In broad and vague terms, these surfaces arise as the boundaries of domains $E \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ that are minimizers or critical points (within a class of given admissible configurations) of the energy functional:
The Boltzmann equation is a nonlinear evolution equation first put forward by Ludwig Boltzmann to describe the configuration of particles in a gas, but only statistically. However, this equation and related equations are used in other physical situations, such as in optics. The corresponding linear inverse problem is also used in tomography <ref name="Bal2009"/>


\[ J_s(E)= C_{n,s}\int_{E}\int_{E^c}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+s}}dxdy,\;\; s \in (0,1) \]
In reality, the Boltzmann equation is not a single equation but a family of equations, where one obtains different equations depending on the nature of the interaction between particles (see below). Although there has been a lot of progress in the analysis of the Cauchy problem under many circumstances, the broad understanding of the equation and the dynamics of its solutions remains largely incomplete. For an overview of the mathematical issues revolving around this equation see for instance <ref name="Vil2002"/>. A basic reference is also <ref name="CerIllPul1994"/>.


It can be checked easily that this agrees (save for a factor of $2$) with  norm of the characteristic function $\chi_E$ in the homogenous Sobolev space  $\dot{H}^{\frac{s}{2}}$. The dimensional constant $C_{n,s}$ blows up as $s \to 1^-$, in which case (at least when the boundary of $E$ is smooth enough) one can check that $J_s(E)$ converges to the perimeter of $E$.
== The classical Boltzmann equation ==


Classically,  [[minimal surfaces]] (or generally [[surfaces of constant mean curvature]] ) arise in physical situations where one has two phases interacting (eg. water-air, water-ice ) and the energy of interaction is proportional to the area of the interface, which is due to the interaction between particles/agents in both phases being negligible when they are far apart.
As explained originally by Boltzmann in the probabilistic description of a gas, we assume that the probability that a particle in a gas lies in some region $A$ of phase space $\mathbb{R}^d\times \mathbb{R}^d$ at time $t$ is given by some function


Nonlocal minimal surfaces then, describe physical phenomena where the interaction potential does not decay fast enough as particles are apart, so that two particles on different phases and far from the interface still contribute a non-trivial amount to the total interaction energy, in particular, one may consider much more general energy functionals corresponding to different interaction potentials
\begin{equation*}
\int_A f(x,v,t) \, \mathrm d x \mathrm dv.
\end{equation*}


\[ J_K(E)= \int_{E}\int_{E^c}K(x,y) dxdy \]
Then, under certain (natural) physical assumptions, Boltzmann derived an evolution equation for $f(x,v,t)$. In particular,  if one imposes $f$ at time $t=0$ then $f$ should  solve the  Cauchy problem


== Definition ==
\begin{equation}\label{eqn: Cauchy problem}\tag{1}
\left \{ \begin{array}{rll}
\partial_t f + v \cdot \nabla_x f  & = Q(f,f) & \text{ in } \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}_+,\\
f  & = f_0 & \text{ in } \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}^d \times \{ 0 \}.
\end{array}\right.
\end{equation}


Following the most accepted convention for [[minimal surfaces]],  a (classical) nonlocal minimal surface is (given $s\in (0,1)$) the boundary $\Sigma$ of an open set $E \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ such that $\Sigma$ is at least $C^{1,s+\epsilon}$ and more importantly,  
where $Q(f,f)$ is the Boltzmann collision operator, a non-local operator given by


\[ H_s(x): = C_{n,s}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \frac{\chi_E(y)-\chi_{E^c}(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}dy=0 \;\;\forall\; x \in \Sigma\]
\begin{equation*}
Q(f,f)(v) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\int_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}} B(v-v_*,e) \bigg( f(v'_*)f(v') - f(v_*)f(v) \bigg) d\sigma(e) dv_*.
\end{equation*}


In this case we say that $\Sigma$ is a nonlocal minimal surface in $\Omega$. The quantity $H_s(x)$ is called the "Nonlocal mean curvature of order $s$ of $\Sigma$ at $x$", or briefly, "Nonlocal mean curvature".
here $d\sigma$ denotes the Hausdorff measure on $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$, and given $v,v_* \in \mathbb{R}^d$ and $e \in \mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ we write


Example: Suppose that $E$ and $\Omega$ are such that for any other set $F$ such that $F \Delta E \subset \subset \Omega$ (i.e. $F$ agrees with $E$ outside $\Omega$) we have
\begin{align*}
v'  & = v-(v-v_*,e)e\\
v'_* & = v_*+(v-v_*,e)e
\end{align*}


\[J_s(E) \leq J_s(F) \]
and $B$, which is known as the Boltzmann collision kernel, measures the strength of collisions in different directions.


Then, if it is the case that $E$ has a smooth enough boundary, one can check that $E$ is a nonlocal minimal surface in $\Omega$.
The notation $f' = f(v')$, $f_\ast = f(v_\ast)$ and $f'_\ast = f(v'_\ast)$ is customary.


<div style="background:#DDEEFF;">
== Collision Invariants ==
<blockquote>
'''Note''' For this definition to make sense, $\Sigma$ must be the boundary of some open set $E$, in this article, we will often refer to the set $E$ itself as "the" minimal surface, and no confusion should arise from this.
</blockquote>
</div>


== Nonlocal mean curvature ==
The Cauchy problem \ref{eqn: Cauchy problem} enjoys several conservation laws, which in the Boltzmann literature are known as collision invariants. Take $\phi(v)$ to be any of the following functions


== Surfaces minimizing non-local energy functionals ==
\begin{equation*}
\phi(v) = 1, \;\;v,\;\; \tfrac{|v|^2}{2}
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
\text{(the first and  third ones are real valued functions, the second one is vector valued)}
\end{equation*}


== The Caffarelli-Roquejoffre-Savin Regularity Theorem==
and let $f(x,v,t)$ be any classical solution to \ref{eqn: Cauchy problem}, then we have
 
\begin{equation*}
\frac{d}{dt}\int_{\mathbb{R}^d\times \mathbb{R}^d} f(x,v,t) \phi(v)\;dx\;dv = 0
\end{equation*}
 
according to what $\phi$ we pick this equation corresponds to  conservation of mass, conservation momentum or conservation of energy.
 
== Typical collision kernels ==
 
The collision kernel $B(v_*-v,e)$ should depend only on the distance $|v-v_*|$ and the deviation angle $\theta$ given by
\[ \cos \theta = \frac{(v - v_*) \cdot \sigma }{|v-v_*|}.\]
We abuse notation by writing $B(v_*-v,e) = B(|v_*-v|,\theta)$.
 
The case $B(r,\theta) = Kr$ is known as Maxwell molecules.
 
From particle models interacting by inverse $s$-power force, the collision kernel has the form
\[ B(r,\theta) = r^\gamma \theta^{-d+1-\nu} b(\theta),\]
where
\begin{align*}
\gamma &= \frac{s - (2d - 1)}{s-1}, \\
\nu &= \frac 2 {s-1}, \\
\end{align*}
$b(\theta)$ is some positive bounded function which is not known explicitly.
 
The operator $Q(f,f)$ may not make sense even for $f$ smooth if $\gamma$ is too negative or $\nu$ is too large. The operator does make sense if $\gamma \in (-d,0)$ and $\nu \in (0,2)$.
 
In the case $s = 2d-1$, we obtain that the collision kernel $B(r,\theta)$ depends only on the angular variable $\theta$. This case is called ''Maxwellian molecules''.
 
=== Grad's angular cutoff assumption ===
 
This assumption consists in using a collision kernel that is integrable in the angular variable $\theta$. That is
\[ \int_{S^{d-1}} B(r,e) \mathrm d \sigma(e) < +\infty \text{ for all values of } r. \]
 
The purpose of this assumption is to simplify the mathematical analysis of the equation. Note that for particles interaction by inverse power forces this assumption never holds.
 
== Stationary solutions ==
 
The Gaussian (or Maxweillian) distributions in terms of $v$, which are constant in $x$, are stationary solutions of the equation. That is, any function of the form
\[ f(t,x,v) = a e^{-b|v-v_0|^2}, \]
is a solution. In fact, for this function one can check that the integrand in the definition of $Q$ is identically zero since $f' \, f'_* = f \, f_*$.
 
== Entropy ==
 
The following quantity is called the entropy and is monotone decreasing along the flow of the Boltzmann equation
\[ H(f) = \iint_{\R^d_x \times \R^d_v} f \ \log f \ \mathrm d v \, \mathrm d x. \]
 
The derivative of the entropy is called ''entropy dissipation'' and is given by the expression
\[ D(f) = -\frac{\mathrm d H(f)}{\mathrm d t} = \frac 14 \iint_{\R^{2d}} \int_{S^{d-1}} B(v-v_\ast,\sigma) (f' f'_\ast - f f_\ast) \left( \log (f'f'_\ast) - \log(f f_\ast) \right) \, \mathrm d \sigma \, \mathrm d v \, \mathrm d v_\ast \geq 0. \]
 
Without Grad's angular cut-off assumption, and for a rather general family of cross-sections $B$, the entropy dissipation is bounded below by a fractional Sobolev norm minus a small correction <ref name="ADVW2000" />.
\[ D(f) \geq c_1 \|f\|_{H^{\nu/2}}^2 - c_2 \|f\|_{L^1_2}^2,\]
where $c_1$ and $c_2$ depend only on mass, entropy and energy of $f$.
 
== The Landau Equation ==
 
A closely related evolution equation is the [[Landau equation]]. For Coulomb interactions, the corresponding collision kernel $B$ always diverges, instead in this case, one uses an equation (which is an asymptotic limit of Boltzmann equation) first derived by Landau,
 
\begin{equation*}
f_t + x\cdot \nabla_y f = Q_{L}(f,f)
\end{equation*}
 
where now $Q_{L}(f,f)$ denotes the Landau collision operator, which can be written as
 
\begin{equation*}
Q_{L}(f,f) = \text{Tr}(A[f]D^2f)+f^2
\end{equation*}
 
where $A[f]$ is the matrix valued operator given by convolution with the matrix kernel $K(y)= (8\pi|y|)^{-1}\left ( I -\hat y\otimes \hat y)\right )$, $\hat y = y/|y|$.
 
 
Note that when $f$ is independent of $x$ the above equation becomes second-order parabolic equation where the coefficients depend non-locally on $f$, in particular, one has an apriori estimate for all higher derivatives of $f$ in terms of its $L^\infty$ and $L^1$ norms (via a bootstrapping argument).{{citation needed}}
 
== References ==
{{reflist|refs=
 
<ref name="Bal2009">{{Citation | last1=Bal | first1=G. | title=Inverse transport theory and applications | publisher=IOP Publishing | year=2009 | journal=Inverse Problems | volume=25 | issue=5 | pages=053001}}</ref>
 
<ref name="Vil2002">{{Citation | last1=Villani | first1=C. | title=A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory | publisher=[[Elsevier]] | year=2002 | journal=Handbook of mathematical fluid dynamics | volume=1 | pages=71–74}}</ref>
 
<ref name="CerIllPul1994">{{Citation | last1=Cercignani | first1=Carlo | last2=Illner | first2=R. | last3=Pulvirenti | first3=M. | title=The Mathematical Theory of Dilute Gases (Applied Mathematical Sciences vol 106) | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | year=1994}}</ref>
 
<ref name="ADVW2000">{{Citation | last1=Alexandre | first1= R. | last2=Desvillettes | first2= L. | last3=Villani | first3= C. | last4=Wennberg | first4= B. | title=Entropy dissipation and long-range interactions | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002050000083 | journal=Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. | issn=0003-9527 | year=2000 | volume=152 | pages=327--355 | doi=10.1007/s002050000083}}</ref>
}}

Revision as of 13:06, 26 December 2013

The Boltzmann equation is a nonlinear evolution equation first put forward by Ludwig Boltzmann to describe the configuration of particles in a gas, but only statistically. However, this equation and related equations are used in other physical situations, such as in optics. The corresponding linear inverse problem is also used in tomography [1]

In reality, the Boltzmann equation is not a single equation but a family of equations, where one obtains different equations depending on the nature of the interaction between particles (see below). Although there has been a lot of progress in the analysis of the Cauchy problem under many circumstances, the broad understanding of the equation and the dynamics of its solutions remains largely incomplete. For an overview of the mathematical issues revolving around this equation see for instance [2]. A basic reference is also [3].

The classical Boltzmann equation

As explained originally by Boltzmann in the probabilistic description of a gas, we assume that the probability that a particle in a gas lies in some region $A$ of phase space $\mathbb{R}^d\times \mathbb{R}^d$ at time $t$ is given by some function

\begin{equation*} \int_A f(x,v,t) \, \mathrm d x \mathrm dv. \end{equation*}

Then, under certain (natural) physical assumptions, Boltzmann derived an evolution equation for $f(x,v,t)$. In particular, if one imposes $f$ at time $t=0$ then $f$ should solve the Cauchy problem

\begin{equation}\label{eqn: Cauchy problem}\tag{1} \left \{ \begin{array}{rll} \partial_t f + v \cdot \nabla_x f & = Q(f,f) & \text{ in } \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}_+,\\ f & = f_0 & \text{ in } \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}^d \times \{ 0 \}. \end{array}\right. \end{equation}

where $Q(f,f)$ is the Boltzmann collision operator, a non-local operator given by

\begin{equation*} Q(f,f)(v) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\int_{\mathbb{S}^{d-1}} B(v-v_*,e) \bigg( f(v'_*)f(v') - f(v_*)f(v) \bigg) d\sigma(e) dv_*. \end{equation*}

here $d\sigma$ denotes the Hausdorff measure on $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$, and given $v,v_* \in \mathbb{R}^d$ and $e \in \mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ we write

\begin{align*} v' & = v-(v-v_*,e)e\\ v'_* & = v_*+(v-v_*,e)e \end{align*}

and $B$, which is known as the Boltzmann collision kernel, measures the strength of collisions in different directions.

The notation $f' = f(v')$, $f_\ast = f(v_\ast)$ and $f'_\ast = f(v'_\ast)$ is customary.

Collision Invariants

The Cauchy problem \ref{eqn: Cauchy problem} enjoys several conservation laws, which in the Boltzmann literature are known as collision invariants. Take $\phi(v)$ to be any of the following functions

\begin{equation*} \phi(v) = 1, \;\;v,\;\; \tfrac{|v|^2}{2} \end{equation*} \begin{equation*} \text{(the first and third ones are real valued functions, the second one is vector valued)} \end{equation*}

and let $f(x,v,t)$ be any classical solution to \ref{eqn: Cauchy problem}, then we have

\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dt}\int_{\mathbb{R}^d\times \mathbb{R}^d} f(x,v,t) \phi(v)\;dx\;dv = 0 \end{equation*}

according to what $\phi$ we pick this equation corresponds to conservation of mass, conservation momentum or conservation of energy.

Typical collision kernels

The collision kernel $B(v_*-v,e)$ should depend only on the distance $|v-v_*|$ and the deviation angle $\theta$ given by \[ \cos \theta = \frac{(v - v_*) \cdot \sigma }{|v-v_*|}.\] We abuse notation by writing $B(v_*-v,e) = B(|v_*-v|,\theta)$.

The case $B(r,\theta) = Kr$ is known as Maxwell molecules.

From particle models interacting by inverse $s$-power force, the collision kernel has the form \[ B(r,\theta) = r^\gamma \theta^{-d+1-\nu} b(\theta),\] where \begin{align*} \gamma &= \frac{s - (2d - 1)}{s-1}, \\ \nu &= \frac 2 {s-1}, \\ \end{align*} $b(\theta)$ is some positive bounded function which is not known explicitly.

The operator $Q(f,f)$ may not make sense even for $f$ smooth if $\gamma$ is too negative or $\nu$ is too large. The operator does make sense if $\gamma \in (-d,0)$ and $\nu \in (0,2)$.

In the case $s = 2d-1$, we obtain that the collision kernel $B(r,\theta)$ depends only on the angular variable $\theta$. This case is called Maxwellian molecules.

Grad's angular cutoff assumption

This assumption consists in using a collision kernel that is integrable in the angular variable $\theta$. That is \[ \int_{S^{d-1}} B(r,e) \mathrm d \sigma(e) < +\infty \text{ for all values of } r. \]

The purpose of this assumption is to simplify the mathematical analysis of the equation. Note that for particles interaction by inverse power forces this assumption never holds.

Stationary solutions

The Gaussian (or Maxweillian) distributions in terms of $v$, which are constant in $x$, are stationary solutions of the equation. That is, any function of the form \[ f(t,x,v) = a e^{-b|v-v_0|^2}, \] is a solution. In fact, for this function one can check that the integrand in the definition of $Q$ is identically zero since $f' \, f'_* = f \, f_*$.

Entropy

The following quantity is called the entropy and is monotone decreasing along the flow of the Boltzmann equation \[ H(f) = \iint_{\R^d_x \times \R^d_v} f \ \log f \ \mathrm d v \, \mathrm d x. \]

The derivative of the entropy is called entropy dissipation and is given by the expression \[ D(f) = -\frac{\mathrm d H(f)}{\mathrm d t} = \frac 14 \iint_{\R^{2d}} \int_{S^{d-1}} B(v-v_\ast,\sigma) (f' f'_\ast - f f_\ast) \left( \log (f'f'_\ast) - \log(f f_\ast) \right) \, \mathrm d \sigma \, \mathrm d v \, \mathrm d v_\ast \geq 0. \]

Without Grad's angular cut-off assumption, and for a rather general family of cross-sections $B$, the entropy dissipation is bounded below by a fractional Sobolev norm minus a small correction [4]. \[ D(f) \geq c_1 \|f\|_{H^{\nu/2}}^2 - c_2 \|f\|_{L^1_2}^2,\] where $c_1$ and $c_2$ depend only on mass, entropy and energy of $f$.

The Landau Equation

A closely related evolution equation is the Landau equation. For Coulomb interactions, the corresponding collision kernel $B$ always diverges, instead in this case, one uses an equation (which is an asymptotic limit of Boltzmann equation) first derived by Landau,

\begin{equation*} f_t + x\cdot \nabla_y f = Q_{L}(f,f) \end{equation*}

where now $Q_{L}(f,f)$ denotes the Landau collision operator, which can be written as

\begin{equation*} Q_{L}(f,f) = \text{Tr}(A[f]D^2f)+f^2 \end{equation*}

where $A[f]$ is the matrix valued operator given by convolution with the matrix kernel $K(y)= (8\pi|y|)^{-1}\left ( I -\hat y\otimes \hat y)\right )$, $\hat y = y/|y|$.


Note that when $f$ is independent of $x$ the above equation becomes second-order parabolic equation where the coefficients depend non-locally on $f$, in particular, one has an apriori estimate for all higher derivatives of $f$ in terms of its $L^\infty$ and $L^1$ norms (via a bootstrapping argument).[citation needed]

References

  1. Bal, G. (2009), "Inverse transport theory and applications", Inverse Problems (IOP Publishing) 25 (5): 053001 
  2. Villani, C. (2002), "A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory", Handbook of mathematical fluid dynamics (Elsevier) 1: 71–74 
  3. Cercignani, Carlo; Illner, R.; Pulvirenti, M. (1994), The Mathematical Theory of Dilute Gases (Applied Mathematical Sciences vol 106), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag 
  4. Alexandre, R.; Desvillettes, L.; Villani, C.; Wennberg, B. (2000), "Entropy dissipation and long-range interactions", Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 152: 327--355, doi:10.1007/s002050000083, ISSN 0003-9527, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002050000083