Myths about nonlocal equations

From Mwiki

Revision as of 23:13, 15 July 2011 by Luis (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The following myths are usually heard in the corridors of some math departments and conference coffee breaks.


Contents

There are no new difficulties in nonlocal equations and everything is proved analogously as in the classical case

Nonlocal equations is a much richer class than the usual PDE. Predictably, there are some intrinsic difficulties. A common difficulty comes from the fact that fractional order operators have different scaling properties and therefore interact differently with other terms. Moreover, in certain cases there are some surprising results which do not match what one would expect from local PDE intuition. We have a list of results that are fundamentally different to the local case.

Nonlocal equations is a field in which one replaces the Laplacian by the fractional Laplacian in whatever equation and writes a paper

One can certainly do this. In some cases the classical methods would work after a simple adaptation. In other cases there is a significant difference either in the methods or in the results. Naturally, the good papers are the ones that fit into the second category. This wiki should help people learn to differentiate one from the other.

Nonlocal equations are bizarre and unnatural objects

The Starting page of this wiki should clarify the importance of nonlocal equations.

Most equations in nature are local

In fact the opposite is true. In many cases local PDEs are a good simplification though.

All statements and proofs in nonlocal equations involve gigantic formulas

Nonlocal equations usually involve integral quantities that are larger to write than usual derivatives. This is a notation problem to a large extent. Many proofs in nonlocal equations deal with long integral quantities that come from the nonlocal character of the equation. These features are there, but are rarely at the essence of the arguments. Most statements and proofs are just as conceptual as in usual PDEs.

Personal tools