Nonlocal Evans-Krylov theorem and Evans-Krylov theorem: Difference between pages

From nonlocal pde
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Luis
No edit summary
 
imported>Luis
(Created page with "The Evans-Krylov theorem says that if $u$ is a solution to a uniformly elliptic, fully nonlinear, convex or concave, equation \[ F(D^2 u) = 0 \text{ in } B_1,\] then $u \in C^{2,...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The classical [[Evans-Krylov theorem]] <ref name="E"/> <ref name="K"/> says that convex or concave fully nonlinear elliptic equations have $C^{2,\alpha}$ (therefore classical) solutions. This type of equations can be written as a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation.
The Evans-Krylov theorem says that if $u$ is a solution to a uniformly elliptic, fully nonlinear, convex or concave, equation
\[ \sup_\beta a_{ij}^\beta \partial_{ij} u = f \]
\[ F(D^2 u) = 0 \text{ in } B_1,\]
for a family of uniformly elliptic coefficients $a_{ij}^\alpha$.
then $u \in C^{2,\alpha}(B_{1/2})$ and there is an estimate
\[ \|u\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B_{1/2})} \leq C \|u\|_{L^\infty(B_1)}, \]
where $C$ and $\alpha>0$ depend only on the ellipticity constants and dimension.


A purely integro-differential version of this theorem<ref name="CS3"/> says that solutions of an integro-differential [[Bellman equation]] of the form
{{stub}}
\[ \sup_\beta \int_{\R^n} (u(x+y) - u(x)) K_\beta (y) \mathrm d y = 0 \qquad \text{in } B_1\]
are $C^{s+\alpha}(B_{1/2})$ (which implies that they are classical) if the kernels satisfy the following assumptions
\begin{align*}
\frac{(2-s)\lambda}{|y|^{n+s}} \leq K(y) &\leq \frac{(2-s)\Lambda}{|y|^{n+s}} && \text{uniform ellipticity of order $s$} \\
D^2 K(y) &\leq \frac{(2-s)\Lambda}{|y|^{n+s+2}} && \text{Decay of the tails of $K$ in $C^2$} \\
K(y) &= K(-y) && \text{symmetry}
\end{align*}
 
The $C^{s+\alpha}$ estimate '''does not blow up as $s \to 2$'''. Thus, the result is a true generalization of Evans-Krylov theorem.
 
Note that the result is relevant only if $s>1$, otherwise it is a weaker result compared to the [[differentiability estimates|$C^{1,\alpha}$ estimates]].
 
The hypothesis above are most probably not optimal. Most likely a similar estimate would hold for kernels with $C^\alpha$ dependence respect $x$. Unlike the [[differentiability estimates|$C^{1,\alpha}$ estimates]], no variation of this result is known.
 
== References ==
{{reflist|refs=
<ref name="CS3">{{Citation | last1=Caffarelli | first1=Luis | last2=Silvestre | first2=Luis | title=The Evans-Krylov theorem for non local fully non linear equations | year=to appear | journal=[[Annals of Mathematics]] | issn=0003-486X}}</ref>
<ref name="E">{{Citation | last1=Evans | first1=Lawrence C. | title=Classical solutions of fully nonlinear, convex, second-order elliptic equations | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160350303 | doi=10.1002/cpa.3160350303 | year=1982 | journal=[[Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics]] | issn=0010-3640 | volume=35 | issue=3 | pages=333–363}}</ref>
<ref name="K">{{Citation | last1=Krylov | first1=N. V. | title=Boundedly inhomogeneous elliptic and parabolic equations | year=1982 | journal=Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya | issn=0373-2436 | volume=46 | issue=3 | pages=487–523}}</ref>
}}

Latest revision as of 16:59, 13 May 2012

The Evans-Krylov theorem says that if $u$ is a solution to a uniformly elliptic, fully nonlinear, convex or concave, equation \[ F(D^2 u) = 0 \text{ in } B_1,\] then $u \in C^{2,\alpha}(B_{1/2})$ and there is an estimate \[ \|u\|_{C^{2,\alpha}(B_{1/2})} \leq C \|u\|_{L^\infty(B_1)}, \] where $C$ and $\alpha>0$ depend only on the ellipticity constants and dimension.

This article is a stub. You can help this nonlocal wiki by expanding it.