Nonlocal minimal surfaces and Semilinear equations: Difference between pages

From nonlocal pde
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nestor
No edit summary
 
imported>Luis
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
In broad and vague terms, these surfaces arise as the boundaries of domains $E \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ that minimize (within a class of given admissible configurations) the energy functional:
An equation is called semilinear if it consists of the sum of a well understood linear term plus a lower order nonlinear term. For elliptic and parabolic equations, the two effective possibilities for the linear term is to be either the [[fractional Laplacian]] or the [[fractional heat equation]].


\[ J_s(E)= C_{n,s}\int_{E}\int_{E^c}\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n+s}}dxdy,\;\; s \in (0,1) \]
Some equations which technically do not satisfy the definition above are still considered semilinear. For example evolution equations of the form
\[ u_t + (-\Delta)^s u + H(x,u,Du) = 0 \]
can be thought of as semilinear equations even if $s<1/2$.


It can be checked easily that this agrees (save for a factor of $2$) with  norm of the characteristic function $\chi_E$ in the homogenous Sobolev space  $\dot{H}^{\frac{s}{2}}$. The dimensional constant $C_{n,s}$ blows up as $s \to 1^-$, in which case (at least when the boundary of $E$ is smooth enough) one can check that $J_s(E)$ converges to the perimeter of $E$.
== Some common semilinear equations ==


Classically,  [[minimal surfaces]] (or generally [[surfaces of constant mean curvature]] ) arise in physical situations where one has two phases interacting (eg. water-air, water-ice ) and the energy of interaction is proportional to the area of the interface, which is due to the interaction between particles/agents in both phases being negligible when they are far apart.
=== The most common elliptic equation in the world (provisional title) ===
Adding a zeroth order term to the right hand side to either the Laplace equation or the fractional Laplace equation is probably the theme for which the largest number of papers have been written on PDEs.
\[ (-\Delta)^s u = f(u). \]
If $f$ is $C^\infty$ and some initial regularity can be shown to the solution $u$ (like $L^p$), then the solution $u$ will also be $C^\infty$, which can be shown by a standard [[bootstrapping]].


Nonlocal minimal surfaces then, describe physical phenomena where the interaction potential does not decay fast enough as particles are apart, so that two particles on different phases and far from the interface still contribute a non-trivial amount to the total interaction energy, in particular, one may consider much more general energy functionals corresponding to different interaction potentials
Natural question to ask about this type of equations are about the existence of nontrivial global solutions that vanish at infinity, positivity of solutions, symmetries, etc... Depending on the structure of the nonlinearity $f(u)$, different results are obtained.


\[ J_K(E)= \int_{E}\int_{E^c}K(x,y) dxdy \]
=== Reaction diffusion equations ===
This general class refers to the equations we get by adding a zeroth order term to the right hand side of a heat equation. For the fractional case, it would look like
\[ u_t + (-\Delta)^s u = f(u). \]


== Definition ==
The case $f(u) = u(1-u)$ corresponds to the Fisher equation. For this and other related models, it makes sense to study solutions restricted to $0 \leq u \leq 1$. The research centers around traveling waves, their stability, limits, asymptotic behavior <ref name="CR"/>, etc... Solutions are trivially $C^\infty$ so there is no issue about regularity.


Following the most accepted convention for [[minimal surfaces]],  a nonlocal minimal surface is the boundary $\Sigma$ of an open set $E \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ such that $\chi_E \in \dot{H}^{s/2}$ and whose [[Nonlocal mean curvature]] $H_s$ is identically zero, that is
=== Burgers equation with fractional diffusion ===
It refers to the parabolic equation for a function on the real line $u:[0,+\infty) \times \R \to \R$,
\[ u_t + u \ u_x + (-\Delta)^s u = 0 \]
The equation is known to be well posed if $s \geq 1/2$ and to develop shocks if $s<1/2$ <ref name="KNS"/>. Still, if $s \in (0,1/2)$, the solution regularizes for large enough times<ref name="CCS"/><ref name="K"/>.


\[ H_s(x): = C_{n,s}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \frac{\chi_E(y)-\chi_{E^c}(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}dy=0 \;\;\forall\; x \in \Sigma\]
=== [[Surface quasi-geostrophic equation]] ===
It refers to the parabolic equation for a scalar function on the plane $\theta:[0,+\infty) \times \R^2 \to \R$,
\[ \theta_t + u \cdot \nabla \theta + (-\Delta)^s \theta = 0 \]
where $u = R^\perp \theta$ (and $R$ is the Riesz transform).


In this case we say that $\Sigma$ is a nonlocal minimal surface in $\Omega$.
The equation is well posed if $s \geq 1/2$. The well posedness in the case $s < 1/2$ is a major open problem. It is believed that solving the supercritical SQG equation could possibly help understand 3D Navier-Stokes equation.


=== Conservation laws with fractional diffusion ===
(aka "fractal conservation laws")
It refers to parabolic equations of the form
\[ u_t + \mathrm{div } F(u) + (-\Delta)^s u = 0.\]
The Cauchy problem is known to be well posed classically if $s > 1/2$ <ref name="DI"/>. For $s<1/2$ there are viscosity solutions that are not $C^1$.


Example: Suppose that $E$ and $\Omega$ is such that for any other domain $F$ such that $F \Delta E \subset \subset \Omega$ (i.e. $F$ agrees with $E$ outside $\Omega$) we have
The critical case $s=1/2$ appears not to be written anywhere. However, it can be solved following the same method as for the Hamilton-Jacobi equations with fractional diffusion (below) <ref name="S"/> or the modulus of continuity approach <ref name="K"/>.


\[J_s(E) \leq J_s(F) \]
=== Hamilton-Jacobi equation with fractional diffusion ===
It refers to the parabolic equation
\[ u_t + H(\nabla u) + (-\Delta)^s u = 0.\]


Then, if it is the case that $E$ has a smooth enough boundary, one can check that $E$ is a nonlocal minimal surface in $\Omega$.
The Cauchy problem is known to be well posed classically if $s \geq 1/2$. For $s<1/2$ there are viscosity solutions that are not $C^1$.


<div style="background:#DDEEFF;">
The subcritical case $s>1/2$ can be solved with classical [[bootstrapping]] <ref name="DI"/>. The critical case $s=1/2$ was solved using the regularity results for [[drift-diffusion equations]] <ref name="S"/>.
<blockquote>
'''Note''' For this definition to make sense, $\Sigma$ must be the boundary of some open set $E$, in this article, we will often refer to the set $E$ itself as "the" minimal surface, and no confusion should arise from this.
</blockquote>
</div>


 
== References ==
== Nonlocal mean curvature ==  
{{reflist|refs=
 
<ref name="KNS">{{Citation | last1=Kiselev | first1=Alexander | last2=Nazarov | first2=Fedor | last3=Shterenberg | first3=Roman | title=Blow up and regularity for fractal Burgers equation | year=2008 | journal=Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations | issn=1548-159X | volume=5 | issue=3 | pages=211–240}}</ref>
== Surfaces minimizing non-local energy functionals ==
<ref name="S">{{Citation | last1=Silvestre | first1=Luis | title=On the differentiability of the solution to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation with critical fractional diffusion | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2010.09.007 | doi=10.1016/j.aim.2010.09.007 | year=2011 | journal=Advances in Mathematics | issn=0001-8708 | volume=226 | issue=2 | pages=2020–2039}}</ref>
 
<ref name="CCS">{{Citation | last1=Chan | first1=Chi Hin | last2=Czubak | first2=Magdalena | last3=Silvestre | first3=Luis | title=Eventual regularization of the slightly supercritical fractional Burgers equation | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2010.27.847 | doi=10.3934/dcds.2010.27.847 | year=2010 | journal=Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series A | issn=1078-0947 | volume=27 | issue=2 | pages=847–861}}</ref>
== The Caffarelli-Roquejoffre-Savin Regularity Theorem==
<ref name="K">{{Citation | last1=Kiselev | first1=A. | title=Regularity and blow up for active scalars | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/20105410 | doi=10.1051/mmnp/20105410 | year=2010 | journal=Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena | issn=0973-5348 | volume=5 | issue=4 | pages=225–255}}</ref>
<ref name="DI">{{Citation | last1=Droniou | first1=Jérôme | last2=Imbert | first2=Cyril | title=Fractal first-order partial differential equations | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-006-0429-2 | doi=10.1007/s00205-006-0429-2 | year=2006 | journal=Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis | issn=0003-9527 | volume=182 | issue=2 | pages=299–331}}</ref>
<ref name="CR">{{Citation | last1=Cabré | first1=Xavier | last2=Roquejoffre | first2=Jean-Michel | title=Propagation de fronts dans les équations de Fisher-KPP avec diffusion fractionnaire | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2009.10.012 | doi=10.1016/j.crma.2009.10.012 | year=2009 | journal=Comptes Rendus Mathématique. Académie des Sciences. Paris | issn=1631-073X | volume=347 | issue=23 | pages=1361–1366}}</ref>
}}

Revision as of 09:54, 2 July 2011

An equation is called semilinear if it consists of the sum of a well understood linear term plus a lower order nonlinear term. For elliptic and parabolic equations, the two effective possibilities for the linear term is to be either the fractional Laplacian or the fractional heat equation.

Some equations which technically do not satisfy the definition above are still considered semilinear. For example evolution equations of the form \[ u_t + (-\Delta)^s u + H(x,u,Du) = 0 \] can be thought of as semilinear equations even if $s<1/2$.

Some common semilinear equations

The most common elliptic equation in the world (provisional title)

Adding a zeroth order term to the right hand side to either the Laplace equation or the fractional Laplace equation is probably the theme for which the largest number of papers have been written on PDEs. \[ (-\Delta)^s u = f(u). \] If $f$ is $C^\infty$ and some initial regularity can be shown to the solution $u$ (like $L^p$), then the solution $u$ will also be $C^\infty$, which can be shown by a standard bootstrapping.

Natural question to ask about this type of equations are about the existence of nontrivial global solutions that vanish at infinity, positivity of solutions, symmetries, etc... Depending on the structure of the nonlinearity $f(u)$, different results are obtained.

Reaction diffusion equations

This general class refers to the equations we get by adding a zeroth order term to the right hand side of a heat equation. For the fractional case, it would look like \[ u_t + (-\Delta)^s u = f(u). \]

The case $f(u) = u(1-u)$ corresponds to the Fisher equation. For this and other related models, it makes sense to study solutions restricted to $0 \leq u \leq 1$. The research centers around traveling waves, their stability, limits, asymptotic behavior [1], etc... Solutions are trivially $C^\infty$ so there is no issue about regularity.

Burgers equation with fractional diffusion

It refers to the parabolic equation for a function on the real line $u:[0,+\infty) \times \R \to \R$, \[ u_t + u \ u_x + (-\Delta)^s u = 0 \] The equation is known to be well posed if $s \geq 1/2$ and to develop shocks if $s<1/2$ [2]. Still, if $s \in (0,1/2)$, the solution regularizes for large enough times[3][4].

Surface quasi-geostrophic equation

It refers to the parabolic equation for a scalar function on the plane $\theta:[0,+\infty) \times \R^2 \to \R$, \[ \theta_t + u \cdot \nabla \theta + (-\Delta)^s \theta = 0 \] where $u = R^\perp \theta$ (and $R$ is the Riesz transform).

The equation is well posed if $s \geq 1/2$. The well posedness in the case $s < 1/2$ is a major open problem. It is believed that solving the supercritical SQG equation could possibly help understand 3D Navier-Stokes equation.

Conservation laws with fractional diffusion

(aka "fractal conservation laws") It refers to parabolic equations of the form \[ u_t + \mathrm{div } F(u) + (-\Delta)^s u = 0.\] The Cauchy problem is known to be well posed classically if $s > 1/2$ [5]. For $s<1/2$ there are viscosity solutions that are not $C^1$.

The critical case $s=1/2$ appears not to be written anywhere. However, it can be solved following the same method as for the Hamilton-Jacobi equations with fractional diffusion (below) [6] or the modulus of continuity approach [4].

Hamilton-Jacobi equation with fractional diffusion

It refers to the parabolic equation \[ u_t + H(\nabla u) + (-\Delta)^s u = 0.\]

The Cauchy problem is known to be well posed classically if $s \geq 1/2$. For $s<1/2$ there are viscosity solutions that are not $C^1$.

The subcritical case $s>1/2$ can be solved with classical bootstrapping [5]. The critical case $s=1/2$ was solved using the regularity results for drift-diffusion equations [6].

References

  1. Cabré, Xavier; Roquejoffre, Jean-Michel (2009), "Propagation de fronts dans les équations de Fisher-KPP avec diffusion fractionnaire", Comptes Rendus Mathématique. Académie des Sciences. Paris 347 (23): 1361–1366, doi:10.1016/j.crma.2009.10.012, ISSN 1631-073X, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2009.10.012 
  2. Kiselev, Alexander; Nazarov, Fedor; Shterenberg, Roman (2008), "Blow up and regularity for fractal Burgers equation", Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations 5 (3): 211–240, ISSN 1548-159X 
  3. Chan, Chi Hin; Czubak, Magdalena; Silvestre, Luis (2010), "Eventual regularization of the slightly supercritical fractional Burgers equation", Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series A 27 (2): 847–861, doi:10.3934/dcds.2010.27.847, ISSN 1078-0947, http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2010.27.847 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Kiselev, A. (2010), "Regularity and blow up for active scalars", Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena 5 (4): 225–255, doi:10.1051/mmnp/20105410, ISSN 0973-5348, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/20105410 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Droniou, Jérôme; Imbert, Cyril (2006), "Fractal first-order partial differential equations", Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 182 (2): 299–331, doi:10.1007/s00205-006-0429-2, ISSN 0003-9527, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-006-0429-2 
  6. 6.0 6.1 Silvestre, Luis (2011), "On the differentiability of the solution to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation with critical fractional diffusion", Advances in Mathematics 226 (2): 2020–2039, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2010.09.007, ISSN 0001-8708, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2010.09.007