Nonlocal porous medium equation: Difference between revisions

From nonlocal pde
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nestor
No edit summary
imported>Nestor
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
The first of the two has the remarkable property (for nonlocal equations at least) that any initial data with compact support remains with compact support for all later times, the opposite is true of the second equation, for which [[instantaneous speed of propagation]] holds.  
The first of the two has the remarkable property (for nonlocal equations at least) that any initial data with compact support remains with compact support for all later times, the opposite is true of the second equation, for which [[instantaneous speed of propagation]] holds.  


This means that the first model presents us with a [[free boundary problem]]. For this model  global existence and H\"older continuity of weak solutions have been recently obtained <ref name="CV1"/>, there is almost nothing known about the properties of its free boundary, this provides with a rich list of good open problems.
This means that the first model presents us with a [[free boundary problem]]. For this model  global existence and Hölder continuity of weak solutions have been recently obtained <ref name="CV1"/>, there is almost nothing known about the properties of its free boundary, this provides with a rich list of good open problems.


For the second equation, both the Cauchy problem and long time behavior have been extensively studied in recent years (references).
For the second equation, both the Cauchy problem and long time behavior have been extensively studied in recent years (references).

Revision as of 17:56, 3 June 2011

The nonlocal porous medium equation of order $\sigma$ is the name currently given to two very different equations, namely

\[ u_t = \nabla \cdot \left ( u \nabla \mathcal{K_\alpha} (u) \right )\]

\[\mbox{ where } \mathcal{K}_\alpha(u) := C_{n,\alpha}\; u * |x|^{-n+\alpha},\;\; \alpha+2=\sigma \]

and

\[ u_t +(-\Delta)^{s}(u^m) = 0 \]

These equations agree when $s=1$ and $m=2$, otherwise they are not only different superficially, they also exhibit extremely different behaviors. They are both fractional order Quasilinear equations.

The first of the two has the remarkable property (for nonlocal equations at least) that any initial data with compact support remains with compact support for all later times, the opposite is true of the second equation, for which instantaneous speed of propagation holds.

This means that the first model presents us with a free boundary problem. For this model global existence and Hölder continuity of weak solutions have been recently obtained [1], there is almost nothing known about the properties of its free boundary, this provides with a rich list of good open problems.

For the second equation, both the Cauchy problem and long time behavior have been extensively studied in recent years (references).

References

  1. Caffarelli, Luis; Vazquez, Juan (2011), "Nonlinear Porous Medium Flow with Fractional Potential Pressure", Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis (Springer Berlin / Heidelberg): 1–29, ISSN 0003-9527, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00205-011-0420-4