Michel Van den Bergh
michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be
Wed Jan 3 09:54:03 CST 2007
> On the other
> hand, it should not be replaced by something that is functionally inferior
> in any way. I consider failure to support recursive calls to be inferior,
> but I don't see why the qq programs, properly packaged would not allow
> recursion too.
As Robert pointed out, the other programs support correctly support
As I pointed out in my earlier email the syntax allowed by romberg:
romberg(romberg(x^2+y^2, x, 0, y), y, 0, 1);
is semantically dubious. I thought it was now agreed upon that
evaluate all their arguments, if at all possible, which apparently
romberg does not do.
More information about the Maxima