[Maxima] A simple way to parse/check equations?
macrakis at alum.mit.edu
Tue Oct 9 11:00:26 CDT 2007
On 10/9/07, Juhana Antero Yrjölä <jayrjola at cc.hut.fi> wrote:
> I have some kind of Maxima equation with functions and possible variables.
> Now I need to determine that all function calls are correct and if not
> then display the incorrect function name with call parameters
You have two issues here: one is parsing, the other is analysis.
Maxima already does the parsing for you:
op(EX) => "+" (Maxima treats the expressions as x^2 + (-1) )
args(EX) => [ x^2 , -1 ]
(you might also want to look at inflag if you care about the
underlying internal representations)
As for the analysis, what is your definition of "correct"? In your
example below, how do you know that ex is "incorrect"? It seems that
you want to check not only the number but the type of arguments. In
this case, you will need to build some sort of structure defining
correct types, e.g.
argtypes[sin]: [ [ scalar ] ] $
argtypes[diff]: [ [any, variable], [any, variable, integer]
] $ -- Two possibilities
This is not built in to Maxima -- type checking is done by each
function in an ad hoc way.
Then you code to check the type. And you need to define a policy about
the interpretation of variables: clearly diff(x,'x,1) is legal, but
how about diff(Q,R,S)? And your system will probably not want to
handle all cases: for example, there is no Q such that diff(Q,Q,Q) is
legal, since Q can't be both an integer and a variable).
> ...recursion must go all the way down.
Maxima (like all modern languages) supports recursion. For example,
to see if an expression includes the variable Q, you can write
if expr=Q then true
elseif atom(expr) then false
Good luck. When is the assignment due?
More information about the Maxima