[Maxima] ordering of *opers-list
willisb at unk.edu
Mon Jun 23 09:31:16 CDT 2008
Changing the order of *opers-list eliminates some bugs (it might introduce
other bugs). Is it intentional that the *opers-list ordering matter?
(%i1) declare(f, multiplicative, f, additive)$
Not OK -- the expand(%,0,0) shouldn't be needed:
Reversing *opers-list eliminates the bug (for no particular reason,
reverse the list):
(%i4) :lisp(setq *opers-list (reverse *opers-list));
The order of the declare --- say declare(f, additive, f, multiplicative, f)
doesn't make any difference, I think.
More information about the Maxima