# [Maxima] RE : simplification to a determinant

Razafy Paul paulrazafi at yahoo.fr
Mon Jul 21 06:35:29 CDT 2008

```Hi all,

I think it is doable but that needs a lot of time and coding(programming)!

What the others think?

Best regards

Paul RAZAFIMANDIMBY

Alexandre Campos <alexandre at emc.ufsc.br> a écrit : Hi people,
I'd like to know if exist some way to "teach" maxima to recognize that some terms in an expresion form a matrix determinant, e.g. that the expresion:

([dx (dx s1y s2z - dy s1x s2z - dx s1z s2y + dz s1x s2y
+ dy s1z s2x - dz s1y s2x) (s4x s5y s6z - s4y s5x s6z - s4x s5z s6y
+ s4z s5x s6y + s4y s5z s6x - s4z s5y s6x)])

is

dx (determinant(M))(determinant(N))

where M is matrix:

dx   dy   dz
s1x s1y s1z
s2x s2y s2z

and N is the matrix

s4x s4y s4z
s5x s5y s5z
s6x s6y s6z

alexandre

--
"No man can serve two masters; for either he will
hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold
to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve
God and mammon." Matthew 6:24

_______________________________________________
Maxima mailing list
Maxima at math.utexas.edu
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima

---------------------------------
Envoyé avec Yahoo! Mail.
Une boite mail plus intelligente.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/attachments/20080721/7a5ee8a4/attachment.htm
```