[Maxima] Representing the case "no result"
macrakis at alum.mit.edu
Tue Jun 9 12:53:25 CDT 2009
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Dieter Kaiser <drdieterkaiser at web.de> wrote:
> ...defint throws a Maxima error, when a divergent integral is found. My
> suggestion was not to throw a Maxima error, because it is not an error
> to have a divergent integral. It does not make sense to break and to
> have a look in the routine which has detected the divergent integral.
> The question was: What should be the return value instead of throwing an
> Here is a list of suggestions so far:
> 1. A symbol 'divergent
> 2. An empty list
> 3. An expression like (($NOOBJECT))
> 4. A tagged expression like (($NOOBJECT) gensym)
> We get a next proposal:
> 5. An element NoObject[i] of an array of NoObjects
Another possibility: something like 'divergent('integrate(x,x,0,inf)). The
main problem with that is that Maxima will happily simplify
divergent('integrate(x,x,0,inf)) - divergent('integrate(x,x,0,inf)) => 0.
Then again, it will also simplify 'integrate(x,x,0,inf) -
'integrate(x,x,0,inf) => 0.
If 'divergent('integrate...) is too big, we can have it print as an
abbreviation by default, e.g. 'divergent!. Same thing, by the way, for
'divergent(?G2342): nothing says we have to *print* the ?G2342.
> My first idea was to search a general and user friendly expression which
> Maxima does not change or use in further calculations. Therefore the
> empty list.
But this gives no information about what exactly went wrong, and an empty
list is a perfectly good object.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Maxima