[Maxima] 'at' simplification
fateman at eecs.berkeley.edu
Sun Apr 8 16:18:51 CDT 2012
On 4/8/2012 11:58 AM, nijso beishuizen wrote:
> Dear all,
> at(diff(g(x),x),[y=1]) - at(diff(g(x),x),[y=0])
> should result in 0. Is there a (built-in) way to achieve this?
no, because if g(x):=x*y
it is false.
> I would expect that 'at' (or some simplification function) would
> recognize that the expression is independent of y.
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Maxima