next up previous
Next: Appendix: Moduliisotriviality, Up: Diophantine geometry in Previous: Diophantine Approximation in

Omitted topics

I felt I could not do justice to and give a proper survey on the following topics, which I'll just mention with a few references. I may have forgotten a few important ones and apologise to any reader whose favourite topic is not mentioned.

(a) Moduli of curves and abelian varieties. The work of Parshin, Zahrin and Szpiro led to the proof that there are only finitely many curves of fixed genus over a fixed function field with a prescribed set of places of bad reduction and there are only finitely many abelian varieties over a fixed function field of characteristic p, prime-to-p isogenous to a given abelian variety. See [Sz] and [MB].

(b) Varieties of general type. Lang conjectured that, on a variety of general type over a number field, the set of rational points is not Zariski dense. One may try to transpose Lang's conjectures to the case of positive characteristic, but they are trivially false already in the case of curves. Two natural approaches to restore the conjecture, which work for curves, are either to insist on non - isotriviality of the variety or to look at points which are not in the image of the Frobenius map. Unfortunately both these approaches fail already for surfaces. In fact, there are unirational surfaces of general type in positive characteristic, and even non-constant families of those, which provide counterexamples to such conjectures. (See [AV2]).One may try to look at varieties with non-zero Kodaira - Spencer class, but there seem to be counterexamples here as well. Again the problem is due to unirational varieties. In all these examples the surfaces have a large set of birational endomorphisms (coming either from the Frobenius or from birational endomorphisms of ), and one may try to take these into account in stating a Lang type conjecture. A rather drastic approach is to look only at varieties which are not covered by non-general type varieties, but this would be an unsatisfactory and almost unverifiable conjecture due to the fact that it not known how to tell whether a variety of general type can be covered by a variety which is not of general type.

In the positive direction, Martin-Deschamps and Lewin-Ménégaux [MDLM] proved that there are only finitely many separable dominating rational maps from X to Y, if X,Y are given varieties with Y of general type.

An example pertaining to this is the following. Let be an abelian variety and f a rational function on A. Consider the cover X of A defined by . If A is defined over then is Zariski dense in X if and only if for some , whereas if A is not defined over this happens if and only if for some , where is the Verschiebung. A proof in the case of elliptic curves is given in [V3] and it readily generalizes to higher dimensions. The condition on f for to be Zariski dense above is equivalent to vanishing of the Kodaira-Spencer class of X. Note that if A is simple of dimension at least 2 and f is not a p-th power, then X is of general type.

(c) The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture. If is an abelian variety, one defines an analytic function and the conjecture of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer states that the order of vanishing of at s=1 is the rank of and gives a formula for the leading coefficient of the Taylor expansion of around s=1. Tate showed, for elliptic curves, that the first statement implies the second up to a power of p, which was removed by Milne, and that the conjecture was equivalent to the finiteness of the Tate-Shafarevich group. This has been generalized to higher dimensions, see [Mi].

(d) Existence of solutions to equations and inequalities We concentrated so far on finiteness statements, but one also expects that varieties which are "very rational" to have many rational points. For example, we have the Lang-Tsen theorem that if are homogeneous polynomials over K of degrees in at least variables, then they have a common non-trivial zero. Carlitz generalized Tsen's method to deal with solutions of diophantine "inequalities" too. See [Ca], [Gre].



next up previous
Next: Appendix: Moduliisotriviality, Up: Diophantine geometry in Previous: Diophantine Approximation in



Felipe Voloch
Tue Jan 16 16:22:19 CST 1996