next up previous
Next: References Up: Diophantine geometry in Previous: Omitted topics

Appendix: Moduli, isotriviality, deformation theory and p-torsion points

 

It is important to note that the notion of isotriviality is up to isomorphism. In particular it can happen than an affine open subset of an isotrivial variety is non-isotrivial. The notions of birationally isotrivial and weakly isotrivial, on the other hand, are birational notions. If K is the function field of a variety T defined over a finite field and is a variety, then X corresponds to a family with generic fibre X. It is well-known that, in the projective case, X is isotrivial if and only if is generically constant, i.e., there is a non-empty open subset U of T such that the fibres over all points of U are isomorphic. (See e.g. [B1] Ch. 1, lemma (1.3)).

In characteristic zero, there is another equivalent notion of isotriviality, that of infinitesimally isotrivial. Although the equivalence of the notions does not hold in characteristic p, it is still very useful to consider infinitesimal isotriviality. To do that we first must define the Kodaira-Spencer class, in a more general setting than usual, following Katz [K].

Let be a smooth projective variety over K, D a divisor with normal crossings on and . Define a sheaf on of vector fields tangent to D, which is a subsheaf of the tangent sheaf of . Equivalently, is the sheaf of K-derivations of that preserve the ideal sheaf of D. If is a derivation on K we define the Kodaira-Spencer class in as follows. Let be an open cover of fine enough so that we can lift to derivations of , preserving the ideal of . The 1-cocycle then defines the class . We define X to be infinitesimally isotrivial if for all .

Let X be a variety over a function field K of transcendence degree 1 over a finite field. it is convenient to study whether or not X is defined over using derivations: let t be a separating variable in K, and let C be an affine model of K over which is a regular vector field. Let be a model of X, proper over C. Then that X can be defined over if and only if the derivation lifts to a vector field over the inverse image in U of some open subset of C, satisfying . See [V2], lemma 1 or [Og], lemma 3.5. Note that, obviously, lifts if and only if and, as shown in loc. cit., the condition is automatically satisfied if .

Example: Let where E is a supersingular elliptic curve with . Choose a K-rational subspace of the Lie algebra of A not defined over and corresponding to a height one group-scheme G. Take the quotient , which is a non-isotrivial abelian variety over K with good reduction everywhere. If , then we can base change by any , and obtain infinitely many families of such varieties. (See [Sz]).

For any projective smooth variety X, there is an obvious map

In the case of abelian varieties, this map is an isomorphism and we can talk about the rank of the Kodaira-Spencer class as a linear map between vector spaces. In particular, we talk about the Kodaira-Spencer class having maximal rank, in this context. To justify the assertion, made in section 3, that abelian varieties with sufficiently general moduli satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 5, we have the following result, proved in [V5].

 

Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank D. Abramovich for many helpful comments and the NSF (grant DMS-9301157) and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for financial support.



next up
Next: References Up: Diophantine geometry in < /A> Previous: Omitted topics

Felipe Voloch
Tue Jan 16 16:22:19 CST 1996